Table of Contents

2020 Month : July Volume : 9 Issue : 30 Page : 2144-2147

Knowledge, Attitude, and Satisfaction of Patients towards Subcutaneous Port.

Mahnaz Abavisani1, Zakiyeh Amini2, Hosnieh Raoufian3, Akram Gazerani4

1Department of Nursing, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran. 2Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran. 3Department of Master of Operating Room, Faculty Member, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran. 4Department of Operating Room and Anaesthesia, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.

References :


Andersen BM. Central implanted venous access port. In: Andersen BM, ed. Prevention and control of infections in hospitals. Springer 2019:569-79. NA       

Google Scholar |

Yu Y, Yoon KA, Kang TW, et al. Therapeutic effect of long‐interval repeated intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in DBA/1 mice with collagen‐induced arthritis. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019;13(7):1134-42.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Wells JR, Gater A, Marshall C, et al. Exploring the impact of infusion frequency in hemophilia a: exit interviews with patients participating in bay 94-9027 extension studies (PROTECT VIII). The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2019;12(6):611-9.            

Google Scholar |

Chambers N, Chen YP. Central venous and arterial access for children. In: Sims C, Weber D, Johnson C, eds. A guide to pediatric anesthesia. Springer 2020:465-74.       

Google Scholar |

Martincich I, Cini K, Lapkin S, et al. Central venous access device complications in patients receiving parenteral nutrition in general ward settings: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2019.                 

Google Scholar |

Rajasekhar A, Streiff MB. Etiology and management of upper-extremity catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. In: Soff G, ed. Thrombosis and hemostasis in cancer. Springer 2019:117-37.           

Google Scholar |

Tajani A, Au A, Fields JM. Ultrasound-guided central venous access. In: Adhikari S, Blaivas M, eds. The ultimate guide to point-of-care ultrasound-guided procedures. Springer 2020:81-98.        

Google Scholar |

Raptis DA, Neal K, Bhalla S. Imaging approach to misplaced central venous catheters. Radiol Clin North Am 2020;58(1):105-17.   

Google Scholar | PubMed

Beck O, Muensterer O, Hofmann S, et al. Central venous access devices (CVAD) in pediatric oncology patients-a single center retrospective study over more than 9 years. Front Pediatr 2019;7:260.               

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Ryan C, Hesselgreaves H, Wu O, et al. Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019;9(7):e026077.         

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Bertoglio S, Cafiero F, Meszaros P, et al. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Vascular Access 2019:1129729819884482.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Gomes CMPP, de Araújo MS. Evaluation of long-stay catheter in patients undergoing chemotherapy-experience of the Americas integrated oncology center. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2020;46(2):e161-2.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Taibi A, Bardet MS, Fontanier SD, et al. Managing chemotherapy extravasation in totally implantable central venous access: use of subcutaneous wash-out technique. J Vasc Access 2020:1129729820905174.          

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Johansson E, Engervall P, Björvell H, et al. Patients’ perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 2009;17(2):137-43.     

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Zhou J, Qian S, He W, et al. Implanting totally implantable venous access port via the internal jugular vein guided by ultrasonography is feasible and safe in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:378.    

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Gabriel JA. Catheter lock solutions to prevent CVAD-related infection. Br J Nurs 2020;29(3):S25-9.            

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Dinçer M, Kocakuşak A, Hut A, et al. Comparison of two different central venous access device insertion techniques: no evil in details. Med Bull Haseki 2019;57:9-14.        

Google Scholar |

Duwadi S, Zhao Q, Budal BS. Peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients-complications and its prevention: a review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 2019;6(1):99-105.              

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Madmoli M, Izadi M, Madmoli M, et al. A systematic review study of the most important complications of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2019;3(1):2-7.


Hofmann S, Goedeke J, König TT, et al. Multivariate analysis on complications of central venous access devices in children with cancer and severe disease influenced by catheter tip position and vessel insertion site (A STROBE-compliant study). Surg Oncol 2020;34:17-23.                               

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Nailon RE, Rupp ME, Lyden E. A Day in the Life of a CVAD. Journal of Infusion Nurs 2019;42(3):125-31.             

Google Scholar |

Sridhar DC, Abou-Ismail MY, Ahuja SP. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children and adults. Thromb Res 2020;187:103-112.  

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Pu YL, Li ZS, Zhi XX, et al. Complications and costs of peripherally inserted central venous catheters compared with implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs 2019.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed

Lenz H, Myre K, Draegni T, et al. A five-year data report of long-term central venous catheters focusing on early complications. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2019;2019:6769506.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed