SEARCH ARTICLES
LATEST ARTICLES
Table of Contents
2019 Month : October Volume : 8 Issue : 43 Page : 3185-3189Total Knee Arthroplasty- A Prospective Randomised Comparison between Functional Outcomes of Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilising Implants.
Pankaj Mahindra1, Prabhjeet Singh2, Rajnish Garg3, Harpal Singh Selhi4, Maheshinder Singh Chauhan5, Ashwani Soni6
1Department of Orthopaedics, DMCH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. 2Department of Orthopaedics, SSMMH, Kochi, Kerala, India. 3Department of Orthopaedics, DMCH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. 4Department of Orthopaedics, DMCH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. 5Department of Orthopaedics, SPS Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. 6Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
References :
Nelissen RG, Hogendoorn PC. Retain or sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty? A histopathological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid disease. J Clin Pathol 2001;54(5):381-4.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedSwanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE. Proprioception, kinesthesia and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(2):328-34.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedConditt MA, Noble PC, Bertolusso R, et al. The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(7 Suppl 2):107-12.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedStraw R, Kulkarni S, Attfield S, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85(5):671-4.
Google Scholar | PubMedHarato K, Bourne RB, Victor J, et al. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 2008;15:217-21.
Luo SX, Zhao JM, Su W, et al. Posterior cruciate substituting versus posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty prostheses: a meta-analysis. Knee 2012;19(4):246-52.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedBercik MJ, Joshi A, Parvizi J. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(3):439-44.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedLi N, Tan Y, Deng Y, et al. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014;22(3):556-64.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedCollins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, et al. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Ou. Arthritis Care & Research 2011;(63 Suppl 11):S208-S28.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedLiow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, et al. The reliability of the American Knee Society Score. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 2000;71(6):603-8.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMedalla GA, Moonot P, Peel T, et al. Cost-benefit comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and the American Knee Society Score in measuring outcome of total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2009;24(4):652-6.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedSingleton N, Nicholas B, Gormack N, et al. Differences in outcome after cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 2019;27(2):2309499019848154.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedSerna-Berna R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, et al. Cruciate-retaining vs posterior-stabilized primary total arthroplasty. Clinical outcome comparison with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Arthroplasty 2018;33(8):2491-5.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedVerra WC, Boom LG, Jacobs WC, et al. Similar outcome after retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2015;86(2):195-201.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMigliorini F, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, et al. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019;29(4):937-46.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedLozano-Calderón SA, Shen J, Doumato DF, et al. Cruciate-retaining vs posterior-substituting inserts in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome comparison. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(2):234-42.e1.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedHunt NC, Ghosh KM, Blain AP, et al. No statistically significant kinematic difference found between a cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized Triathlon knee arthroplasty: a laboratory study involving eight cadavers examining soft-tissue laxity. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(5):642-8.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMatsumoto T, Kubo S, Muratsu H, et al. Different pattern in gap balancing between the cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21(10):2338-45.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedBeaupre LA, Sharifi B, Johnston DWC. A randomized clinical trial comparing posterior cruciate-stabilizingvs posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2017;32(3):818-23.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedNaudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, et al. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15(1):53-64.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedRitter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, et al. Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;(388):51-7.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedBecher C, Heyse TJ, Kron N, et al. Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009;17(10):1159-65.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedCallaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, Goetz DD, et al. Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(404):83-8.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedHozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, et al. The patellar clunk syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(241):203-8.
Google Scholar | PubMedThumboo J, Chew LH, Soh CH. Validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index in Asians with Osteoarthritis in Singapore. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9(5):440-6.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedConaghan PG, Emerton M, Tennant A. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57(8):1363-7.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedAngst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimally clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45(4):384-91.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedTalbot S, Hooper G, Stokes A, et al. Use of a new high activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(2):268-73.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed