Comparison of Severity of Hypotension between Different Positions during Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section.

Alnour TMS, Shaktur AT, Ayyad RA, et al. Comparison between the Side effects of spinal and general anesthesia during caesarean section in Tripoli-Libya. J Anesth Clin Res 2015;6(9):560.                          

Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, et al. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23(10):1114-8.       

Petropoulos G, Siristatidis C, Salamalekis E, et al. Spinal and epidural versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section at term: effect on the acid-base status of the mother and newborn. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13(4):260-6.         

Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10: CD004350.       

Ranasinghe JS, Steadman J, Toyama T, et al. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 2003;91(2):299-300.     

Køhler F, Sørensen JF, Helbo-Hansen HS. Effect of delayed supine positioning after induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46(4):441-6.               

Elgebaly AS. A new modality for improving the efficacy of intrathecal injection for cesarean section. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia 2013;29(1):1-6.

Moore A, Bourrassa-Blanchette S, Mouallem EIE, et al. The median effective seated time for hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia at Cesarean delivery with two doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine: a randomized up-down sequential allocation study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2014;61(10):916-21.                  

Obasuyi BI, Fyneface-Ogan S, Mato CN. A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of lateral and sitting positions during induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22(2):124-8.            

Edomwonyi NP, Ekwere IT, Egbekun R, et al. Anaesthesia related complications in obstetric patients. Afr J Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;6:8-13.

Mendonca C, Griffiths J, Ateleanu B, et al. Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Left lateral position vs. tilted supine position. Anaesthesia 2003;58(5):428-31.             

Gori F, Corradetti F, Cerotto V, et al. Influence of positioning on plain levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Article ID 212696, Anesthesiol Res Pract 2010;2010:1-4.               

Gogarten W. Spinal anaesthesia for obstetrics. Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2003;17(3):377-92.      

Barclay DL, Renegar OJ, Nelson EW Jr. The influence of inferior vena cava compression on the level of spinal anesthesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1968;101(6):792-800.               

Stoneham MD, Eldridge J, Popat M, et al. Oxford positioning technique improves hemodynamic stability and predictability of block height of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 1999;8(4):242-8.        

Miyabe M, Sato S. The effect of head-down tilt position on arterial blood pressure after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth 1997;22(3):239-42.                         

Norris MC. Patient variables and the subarachnoid spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Anesthesiology 1990;72(3):478-82.        

Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, et al. A re-evaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br J Anesthesiology 1993;79(2):262-9.          

Tamilselvan P, Fernando R, Bray J, et al. The effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on cardiac output in the parturient undergoing planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2009;109(6):1916-21.   

Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2009;108(5):1592-8.            

Inglis A, Daniel M, McGrady E. Maternal position during induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. A comparison of right lateral and sitting positions. Anaesthesia 1995;50(4):363-5.                   

Xu Z, Shen F, Zhang Y, et al. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with hypobaric ropivacaine in sitting position significantly increases the incidence of hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2017;43(4):669-75.  

Eckle VS, Grasshoff C. Modified sitting position for the placement of epidural catheter in parturients. Medical Hypotheses 2015;85(2):236.      

Lee MH, Kim EM, Bae JH, et al. Head elevation in spinal-epidural anesthesia provides improved hemodynamics and appropriate sensory block height at caesarean section. Yonsei Med J 2015;56(4):1122-7.                       

Phelan DM, MacEvilly M. A comparison of hyper- and isobaric solutions of bupivacaine for subarachnoid block. Anaesth Intensive Care 1984;12(2):101-7.