SEARCH ARTICLES
LATEST ARTICLES
Table of Contents
2019 Month : July Volume : 8 Issue : 30 Page : 2408-2412MRI EVALUATION OF MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMOURS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION.
Gautham M.1, Sindhu N.2, Bysani Swaroop3, Parthasarathi A.4
1Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
3Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
4Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
References :
Baweja S, Arora R, Singh S, et al. Evaluation of bone tumours with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and co relation with surgical and pathological findings. Ind J Radiol & Imag 2006;16(4):611-8.
Google Scholar |Weatherall PT. Benign and malignant masses. MR imaging differentiation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995;3(4):669-94.
Google Scholar | PubMedReiser MF. MRI in diagnosis and staging of bone tumours. AJR 1996;132:567-76.
Holland BR, Freyschmidt J. Magnetic resonance tomographic results in bone changes associated with sclerosis. Rofo 1988;149(5):513-21.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedSchima W, Amann G, Stiglbauer R, et al. Preoperative staging of osteosarcoma: efficacy of MR imaging in detecting joint involvement. AJR 1994;163(5):1171-5.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedBalzarini L, Sicilia A, Ceglia E, et al. Magnetic resonance in primary in primary bone tumours: a review of 10 years of activities. Radiol Med 1996;91(4):344-7.
Google Scholar | PubMedPriolo F, Cerase A. The current role of radiography in the assessment of skeletal tumours and tumors and tumor-like lesions. Eur J Radiol 1998;27(1):S77-85.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedFrouge C, Vanel D, Coffre C, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Ewing sarcoma. A report of 27 cases. Skeletal Radiol 1988;17(6):387-92.
Google Scholar | PubMedSnug MS, Lee GK, Kang HS, et al. Sacrococcygeal chordoma: MR imaging in 30 patients. Skeletal Radiology 2005;34(2):87-94.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedEnjolras O. Classification and management of the various superficial vascular anomalies: hemangiomas and vascular malformations. J Dermatol 1997;24(11):701-10.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedVlychou M, Athanasou NA. Radiological and pathological diagnosis of paediatric bone tumours and tumour-like lesions. Pathology 2008;40(2):196-216.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedWoertler K. Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13(8):1820-35.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMahnken AH, Nolte-Ernsting CC, Wildberger JE, et al. Aneurysmal bone cyst: value of MR imaging and conventional radiography. Eur Radiol 2003;13(5):1118-24.
Google Scholar | PubMedKonez O, Burrows PE. Magnetic resonance of vascular anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2002;10(2):363-88, vii.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMeyer JS, Hoffer FA, Barnes PD, et al. Biological classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies: MR correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157(3):559-64.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedWetzel LH, Levine E, Murphey MD. A comparison of MR imaging and CT in the evaluation of musculoskeletal masses. Radiographics 1987;7(5):851-74.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedBerquist TH, Ehman RL, King BF, et al. Value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses: study of 95 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155(6):1251-5.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMedMiser JS, Pizzo PA. Soft tissue sarcomas in childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am 1985;32(3):779-800.
CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed