Table of Contents

2018 Month : July Volume : 7 Issue : 27 Page : 3082-3085

ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED LUNG BIOPSIES UNDER PROCEDURAL SEDATION- I-GEL OR PLMA- A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

K. Chandra Sekhar1, D. Vijayakumar Rao2

1Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gitam Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, A. P, India.
2Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gitam Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Visakhapatnam, A. P, India.

References :

1

Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomical investigations of I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anesthesia 2005;60(10):1022-6.     

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
2

Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, et al. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with LMA in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82(2):286-7.       

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
3

Keller C, Brimacombe J, Purhinger F. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesiology Intensive Med Notfallmed Schmerzther 2000;35(11):692-4.    

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
4

Ovasapian A, Klock PA Jr, Chalabi BT. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: fiberoptic assessment of the device position and utility. Anesthesiology 2002;96:A-1321.

5

Kannaujia A, Srivastsava U, Saraswat N, et al. A preliminary study of I-gel: a new supraglottic airway device. Indian J Anaesthesia 2009;53(1):52-6.  

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
6

Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel with LMA-proseal in elective surgeries. Indian J Anesthesia 2009;53(3):302-5.    

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
7

Richez B, Saltel L, Bancheraeu F, et al. A new single use supraglottic airway device with non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the I-gel. Anesth Analg 2008;106(4):1137-9.                      

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
8

Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, et al. Randomised crossover comparison and between the I-gel and the LMA-unique in anesthetized, paralysed adults. Br J of Anaesth 2009;103(6):882-5.                   

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
9

Jindal P, Rizvi A, Sharma JP. Is I-gel a new revolution among supraglottic airway devices? A comparative evaluation. Middle East J Anaesth 2009;20(1):53-8.

Google Scholar | PubMed
10

Helmy AM, Atef HM, EL-Taher EM, et al. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device and classical laryngeal mask in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi J of Anesth 2010;4(3):131-6.            

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
11

Evan NR, Gardner SV, James MF, et al. The proseal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience with 300 cases. Br J of Anesth 2002;88(4):534-9.         

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
12

Gatward JJ, Cook T, Seller C, et al. A cohort study of I-gel in 100 elective cases. Br J of Anesth 2008;63:1124-30.

13

Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with facemask and LMA at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology 2000;93(1):26-31.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
14

Keller C, Puhringer F, Brimacombe JR. The influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the LMA. Br J Anesth 1998;81(2):186-7.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
15

Burgard G, Mollhoff T, Prien T. The effect of laryngeal mask cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat incidence. J Clinic Anesth 1996;8(3):198-201.          

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed