Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(713)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2015 Month : October Volume : 4 Issue : 86 Page : 14984-14988

ETIOLOGY OF GENITAL DISCHARGE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO UROGENITAL MYCOPLASMA IN A MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL.

Swagnik Roy1, Kalpana Karak2, Barun Sahadalal3

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital.
2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital.
3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Swagnik Roy,
Email : swagnik.Roy1442@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Swagnik Roy,
Department of Microbiology,
KPC Medical College & Hospital,
1F Raja S. C. Mallick Road,
Kolkata-700032
E-mail: swagnik.roy1442@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: Mycoplasmhatalesare associated with infection of the genito-urinary tract, reproductive failure, and neonatal morbidity andmortality. Infection with genital mycoplasmas has been linkedwith infertility. Study was conducted from August 2012 to August 2013 in a Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. Total 170patients cervical swab sample were processed among which 120 were symptomatic patients and 50were Healthy controls among the symptomatic patients six Mycoplasma hominis were isolated, three Mycoplasma genitalium were isolated and twelve Ureaplasma urealyticum were isolated. Among healthy controls only controls only one Ureaplasma urealyticum were isolated which may be attributed due to urogenital colonization.

KEYWORDS: Mycoplasma, Genital Discharge, PCR.

INTRODUCTION: Mycoplasma genitalium (M. genitalium) is 1of 15Mycoplasma species isolated in humans. The most commonest colonization site is the urogenital tract.[1] The organism adheres to epithelial cells, invades them, and uses the intracellular environment as a survival area where it multiplies and survives.[2–4] M. Genitalium was first isolated in 1980 from the urethra of 2 men with nongonococcal urethritis.[5] However, because the organism is difficult to culture, clinical and epidemiological studies only became possible following the development of sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in the early 1990s.[6,7] Studies investigating transmission of  M. Genitaliumin couples and DNA sequence typing among sexual partners have concluded that the bacterium is sexually transmitted.[8–12] M. Genitaliumis now considered a main cause of nonchlamydial nongonococcal urethritis (NCNGU) in, men. A meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies reported that the prevalence of M. genitaliumin men with NCNGU was 22%, compared with 6% in those without urethritis (Pooled odds ratio[OR], 5.15;95% confidence interval[CI], 3.6–7.4).[13] Except for 1, all studies were conducted in high income countries.[14] M. Genitalium is also found in the female reproductive tract, and there is increasing evidence that this bacterium may cause cervicitis and urethritis and may be correlated with upper genital tract infections and its sequelae such as tubal factor infertility.[15–20] Mycoplasmatales are associated with infection of the genitourinary tract, reproductive failure, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Infection with genital mycoplasmas has been linked with infertility.[21]

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Present study was conducted from August 2012 to August 2013 in a Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. For the detection of M. genitalium, the endocervical specimen was inserted in a buffer solution, using Cobas Amplicor specimen transport medium collection tubes (Roche Diagnostic Systems). The samples were stored at 4°Cuntil transport to the Microbiology Dept. laboratories within 12 hours of collection. These specimen were kept at -20°C until sample collection from 30 specimen were completed.

Culture for genital mycoplasmas. Specimens were inoculated onto A7agar (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md. 21030) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 5days. For Ureaplasma it is inoculated in 10% urea supplemented broth. Cultures were examined microscopically daily for 5days for the appearance of typical mycoplasma colonies.

A7agar incorporates a direct test for urease that allows the differentiation of urea plasma from the other Mycoplasma tales. Specimens were also inoculated in Urogenital Mycoplasma broth incorporated with yeast extract, Horse Serum, vitamin and minerallo growth supplements and then followed by subculture in to A7agar.

Multiplex PCR assay for genital mycoplasma infection. Bacterial DNA from100mico litre of specimen or transport media was isolated by lysis in 400 micro litre of lysis buffer, extracted with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), and extracted again with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol. DNA was then precipitated in 100% isopropanol, washed in 70% ethanol, and suspended in 15 micro litre of RNase-DNase free sterile deionized water (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.).

Multiplex PCR was performed with primers specific for highly conserved regions in the urease gene of Ureaplasma spp, the 140-kDa adhesion protein gene of M. genitalium, and the 16Sr RNA gene of M. Hominis.(4,5,3,6) Hot-start PCR was performed on the equivalent of 25micro litre of sample in 50microlitre reactions containing a 0.2 mM concentration of de-oxynucleoside triphosphate mixture, 10mM Tris, 3mM MgCl2, 25pmol of eachunlabeled forward primers, and 25pmol of biotin-labeled reverse primer (Table1) and 1.25U of GoldTaq (Applied Biosystems.). All reactions were performed in a Thermocycycler under the:

FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1cycle of 10min at 95°C, followed by 35, two-step cycles of 95°C for            15s and 60°C for 60s, followed by 5min at 72°C PCR product detection. Urea plasma and M. genitalium PCR products were detected by enzyme-linked oligosorbent assay (ELOSA).

M. hominis, were further evaluated by digestion with NarI, which results in the digestion of M. hominis PCR product to fragments of 62 and 272bp Analytical sensitivity. The analytical sensitivity was determined by amplifica-tion of twofold serial dilutions of bacterial DNA, either individually or as a mixture of all three organisms. Dilutions ranged from 3.13 to 100CFU. The lower limit of detection (LOD) was the CFU equivalent of DNA in the last sample positive in the dilution series.

RESULTS OBTAINED: Total 170patients cervical swab sample were processed among which                   120 were symptomatic patients and 50were Healthy controls among the symptomatic patient’s six Mycoplasma hominis were isolated, three Mycoplasma genitalium were isolated and twelve Urea plasma urealyticum were isolated.

 Among healthy controls only controls only one Urea plasma urealyticum were isolated which may be attributed due to urogenital colonization. 2X2 Contingency table showing association between presence of total genital mycoplasmas and type of patient (pt Vs. Control) is shown in the below table.

Total genital mycoplasma isolated

Patient

control

Total

Mycoplasma found

21

1

22

Mycoplasma not found

99

49

148

Total

120

50

170

 

                Exposure rate among patients were found to be 17.5% and among controls it is found to be              2%. The P value is found to be <0.001

DISCUSSION: In our assay we standardised a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Urea plasma spp. M. genitalium, and M. hominis in clinical specimens. This assay appeared to be very sensitive, with an analytical LOD of 12.5CFU for all three organisms. Furthermore, this assay demonstrated high analytical specificity. DNA from other closely related Mycoplasma species, as well as from a variety of other common urogenital organisms did not amplify in this multiplex PCR.

In addition, the multiplex PCR was more sensitive than culture. In clinical specimens, PCR enhanced the detection rate of genital mycoplasma by using specific primers. This increased sensitivity was seen primarily in female specimens, where more true-positive samples were detected by PCR than by culture. Though further study is required to reach in to this hypothesis that PCR is more specific than culture where Urogenital Mycoplasma tales infection is concerned.

REFERENCES:

1.    Taylor-Robinson D, Furr P. Update on sexually transmitted mycoplasma. Lancet1998; 351(Suppl III):12–5.
2.    Jensen JS, Blom J, Lind K. Intracellular location of Mycoplasma geni-taliumin cultured vero cells as demonstrated by electron microscopy. IntJExpPathol1994; 75:91–8.
3.    Blaylock MW, Musatovova O, Baseman JG, Baseman JB. Determination of infectious load of Mycoplasma genitaliumin clinical samples of humanvaginal cells. J Clin Microbiol2004; 2:746–52.
4.    Dallo SF, Baseman JB. Intracellular DNA replication and long-term survival of pathogenic mycoplasmas. Microb Pathog2000; 29:301–9.
5.    Tully JG, Taylor-Robinson D, Cole RM, Rose DL. A newly discovered mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet1981; 1:1288–91.
6.    Jensen JS, Uldum SA, Sondergard-Anderson J, Vuust J, Lind K. Poly-merase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma genitaliuminclinical samples. J Clin Microbiol1991; 29:46–50.
7.    Palmer HM, Gilroy CB, Furr PM, Taylor-Robinson D. Developmen tand evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycoplasma Genitalium. FEMS Microbiol                          Lett1991; 61:199–203.
8.    ThurmanA, MusatovovaO, PerdueS, ShainR, BasemanJB. Mycoplasma genitaliumsymptoms, concordance and treatment inhigh-risk sexual dyads. Int J STD AIDS2010; 21:177–83.
9.    Tosh A, Van der Pol B, Fortenberry J, et al. Mycoplasma genitaliumamong adolescent women and their partners. Adolesc Health2007; 40:412–7.
10.    Hjorth S, Bjornelius E, Lidbrink P, et al. Sequence-based typing of Mycoplasma genitaliumreveals sexual transmission. J Clin Microbiol2006; 44:2078–83.
11.    Ma L, Taylor S, Jensen J, Myers L, Lillis R, Martin D. Short tandem repeat sequences in the Mycoplasma genitaliumgenome and their use in a multilocus genotyping system. BMC Microbiol2008; 8:130–48.
12.    Anagrius C, Lore B, Jensen J. Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence, clinical significance and transmission. Sex Transm Infect2005; 81:458–62.
13.    Jensen J. Mycoplasma genitalium: the etiological agent of urethritis and other sexually transmitted diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol2004; 18:1–11.
14.    Pepin J, Sobela F, Deslandes S, et al. Etiology of urethral discharge in West Africa: the role of Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonasvaginalis. Bull World Health Organ2001; 79:118–26.
15.    Cohen C, Mugo N, Astete S, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in women with laparoscopically diagnosed acute salpingitis. Sex Transm. Infect2005; 81:463–6.
16.    Cohen CR, Manhart LE, Bukusi EA, et al. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium and acute endometritis. Lancet2002; 78:274–7.
17.    Pepin J, LabbeA-C, Khonde N, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium: anorganism commonly associated with cervicitis among West African sex workers. Sex Transm Infect2005; 81:67–72.
18.    Simms I, Eastick K, Mallinson H, et al. Associations between Mycoplasmagenitalium,                              C. trachomatisand pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex TransmInfect2003; 79:154–6.
19.    Manhart LE, Critchlow CW, Holmes KK, et al. Mucopurulent cervicitisand Mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Dis2003; 187:650–7.
20.    Clausen H, Fedder J, Drasbek M, et al. Serological investigation of Mycoplasma genitaliumin infertile women. Hum Reprod2001; 16: 1866–74.
21.     Graber, C. D, P. Creticos, J. Valicenti, and H. O. Williamson. 1979. Mycoplasma in human reproductive failure. Obstet.Gynecol.54: 558–561.

 

Analysis, organism,

and primer or probe

Target or DNA sequence(5’–3’)

 

Length (bp)

Mycoplasma hominis

RNAH1 CAATGGTAATGCCGGATACGC

334bp

Mycoplasma hominis

RNAH2

GGTCCGTCAGTCTGCAAT

334bp

Mycoplasma genitalium

MG16-45 F TACATGCAGTCGATCGGAAGTAGC

282bp

Mycoplasma genitalium

MG16-447R AAACTCCGCCATTGCCTGCCTGCTAG

282bp

Ureaplasma urealyticum

U4 primerACGACGTCCTAAGCACT

429bp

Ureaplasma urealyticum

U5 primer CAATCTGCTCGTGGTATTAC

429bp

Table 1: Nucleotide Sequences of Primers and Probes Used

 


Fig. 1: Dienes’s Stain of Mycoplasma colonies on Urogenital Mycoplasma Agar


Fig. 2: Urogenital Mycoplasma Broth


 

 

 

 

 

Videos :

watch?v