Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(4310)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2014 Month : March Volume : 3 Issue : 10 Page : 2620-2625

FETAL GESTATIONAL AGE ESTIMATION BY FETAL FOOT LENGTH MEASUREMENT AND FETAL FEMUR TO FOOT LENGTH RATIO IN INDIAN POPULATION - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Mukta Mital1, Prashant Gupta2, Vineet Nanda3

1. Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, SIMS.
2. Professor, Department of Radiology, SIMS.
3. Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Subharti and Meerut Scan Centre.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Mukta Mital,
Email : muktamital@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Mukta Mital,
B – 13, Damodar Colony, Garh Road,
Meerut – 250004, U. P.
E-mail: muktamital@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Multiple parameters are in use for the accurate assessment of the gestational age by ultrasound, but the literature suggests that fetal foot length can be used to estimate gestational age, when other parameters are not available for measurement. Foetal femur/ foot length ratio can help in differentiating the foeti that have dysplastic limb reduction, from those whose limbs are short because of constitutional factors/IUGR. A prospective study was done to measure the fetal foot length for gestational age and to evaluate fetal femur to foot length ratio in pregnant women of 16-37 weeks gestation. MATERIALS & METHOD: One hundred and three normal singleton pregnant women of 16-37 weeks gestation were examined for routine obstetrics ultrasound. In these patients fetal foot length measurements were taken and the gestational age was assessed. In addition, fetal femur length to foot length ratio was calculated in each patient. RESULTS/OBSERVATION: Linear relationship between foot length and gestational age was present with a R2 value of 0.90 (p < than 0.001) and the fetal femur length/foot length ratio was found to be more than or equal to 0.92.The foot length can be a reliable parameter for use in assessment of gestational age and as most skeletal dysplasias spare the feet, the fetal femur length/foot length ratio can be used to detect most skeletal dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Foetal foot length is a reliable parameter for assessment of gestational age and femur length/foot length ratio is approximately 1 and a ratio of < 0.92 shall be useful in the detection of most skeletal dysplasia.

KEYWORDS: Foetal foot length, Ultrasound, Femur length, Gestational age.

KEY MESSSAGES: Fetal foot length measurement is a reliable means of estimating the gestational age. Additionally, the fetal femur length to foot length ratio is useful in the detection of most skeletal dysplasias.

 

INTRODUCTION: The fundamentals of the peri-natal care are accurate assessment of gestational age and evaluation of the fetal growth. Multiple parameters of the fetal anatomical measurements by ultrasound are in use for the assessment of gestation, which are fetal crown to rump length (CRL), bi-parietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). All these measurements give an accurate assessment of the fetal gestational age. However, gestational age assessment may be difficult in fetus with anencephaly, hydrocephalus, and short limb dysplasia. Study of literature suggests that fetal foot has a characteristic pattern of normal growth and the fetal foot could be used to estimate gestational age.1 The evaluation of the fetal femur/ foot length ratio can also be a useful parameter to differentiate fetuses that have dysplastic limb reduction, from those whose limbs are short because of constitutional factors/IUGR.2

The present prospective study was designed to correlate the fetal gestational age by ultrasonic measurement of the fetal foot length in pregnant Indian women between 16-37 weeks of pregnancy and to evaluate the fetal femur to foot length ratio, to rule out the possibility of dysplastic anomalies.

The present study aims to study whether fetal foot length measurements can be used to reliably estimate the gestational age and to calculate the relationship between the fetal femur length and foot length.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on one hundred and three normal singleton pregnant women attending the Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Imaging and Interventional Radiology of N.S.C.B. Subharti Medical College, Meerut and Meerut Scan center, Meerut, for a routine antenatal ultrasound examination.

The gestational ages of patients varied between 16 weeks and 37 weeks, as per the LMP of the patient. All these patients had undergone a prior ultrasound examination at or before 14 weeks of gestation to confirm the gestational age. The ultrasound examination was done on GE Logique book XP unit and Medison unit with a 3.5MHz transducer. The fetal foot was measured from skin edge overlying heel to the distal end of the longest toe, either 1st or 2nd toe, on either the plantar or sagittal views by electronic calipers [Figure 1-2].

The Femur diaphyseal length was measured by measuring only the ossified portions of diaphysis and metaphysis, an internationally accepted method and the femur length/ foot length ratios were calculated for each.

RESULTS: The gestational ages of the fetuses ranged from 16-37 weeks with the majority of patients (38.8%) between 22 weeks -24 weeks gestation (by previous ultrasound measurement).

The relationship between the fetal foot length and the gestational age and fetal femur length to foot length ratio was calculated Tables 1 and 2.

 

Menstrual Age

No of fetuses

5th (mm)

50th (mm)

95th (mm)

16 weeks

4

17

21

23

17 weeks

3

20

25

28

18 weeks

7

23

27

31

19 weeks

5

25

31

34

21 weeks

8

29

35

40

22 weeks

12

33

38

43

23 weeks

17

35

42

46

26 weeks

10

42

49

54

28 weeks

4

47

54

59

30 weeks

3

52

59

63

31 weeks

4

54

62

66

32 weeks

3

56

63

68

33 weeks

6

60

66

71

35 weeks

4

65

69

76

36 weeks

9

67

72

78

37 weeks

4

70

74

80

Table 1: The relationship between the fetal foot length percentile and gestational age

A significant linear relationship between these parameters was present & demonstrated a strong correlation with a R2 value of 0.90 (p less than 0.001)

 

Menstrual age

No. of fetuses

Femur length

Mm  (50th  percentile)

Foot length

mm (50th percentile)

Ratio of femur

length to foot length

16 weeks

4

20

21

0.95

17 weeks

3

23

25

0.92

18 weeks

7

26

27

0.96

19 weeks

5

30

31

0.96

21 weeks

8

35

35

1

22 weeks

12

38

38

1

23 weeks

17

40

42

0.95

26 weeks

10

49

49

1

28 weeks

4

54

54

1

30 weeks

3

57

58

0.99

31weeks

4

60

62

0.96

32 weeks

3

62

63

0.98

33 weeks

6

64

66

0.96

35 weeks

4

68

69

0.98

36 weeks

9

70

72

0.97

37 weeks

4

72

74

0.97

Table 2: The femur length/foot length ratio

 

The femur length to foot length ratio was found to be equal to or more than 0.92 throughout this gestational age range.

The foot length and femur length measurements are shown at different gestational ages in three different patients [Figure 3-4-5].

DISCUSSION: Antenatal ultrasound examination has been an indispensable imaging modality in assessing gestational age. Multiple parameters are used for assessing the fetal age as crucial decisions have to be made on the basis of fetal biometric measurements. Advent of modern ultrasound units with high resolution has made accurate assessment of even fetal extremities possible. Streeter, in 1920, showed that the fetal foot has a characteristic pattern of normal growth. He proposed that the fetal foot could be used to estimate the gestational age.1 Mercer et al, in 1987, found that the fetal foot length is a reliable parameter for use in assessment of gestational age and is particularly useful when other parameters do not accurately predict gestational age, like in hydrocephalus, anencephaly, short limb dysplasia. They reported a strong correlation between foot length and gestational age with an R2 value of 0.981.3 Other authors have also reported similar results.4, 5 Very few such studies could be found in literature from India6. Recent study of Drey et al also found data of fetal foot length measurements close to that of Mercer et al.7

The femur length to foot length ratio i.e. ratio of the ossified femur length to foot length on the plantar view has been studied by several authors.1, 2, 8, 9 The ossified femur length is almost equal to the foot length throughout the gestational age. If the fetus is constitutionally small or there is symmetrical IUGR, the ratio is generally greater than or equal to 0.9.10 Other authors have reported ratio >0.85, as the cut off.2, 8 However, in most skeletal dysplasias characterized by limb shortening , the ratio has been reported as less than 0.9 because of the relative sparing of hands and feet.10 Thus, the ratio may help to differentiate fetuses that have dysplastic limb reduction from those whose limbs are short because of IUGR/ constitutional factors.2, 9 Recently, Meirowitz et al have reported foot length is approximately equal to femur length throughout the gestation and the ratio can be used to detect most skeletal dysplasias. However, they found that as 29.4% of foot lengths from large for gestational age fetuses are above the 90th percentile and 60.6% foot lengths in small for gestational age are less than 10th percentile, foot length cannot be used to assess gestational age in fetuses with growth abnormality.11

CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that fetal foot length is a reliable parameter for use in assessment of gestational age and is particularly useful when other parameters cannot predict gestational age like in fetal hydrocephalus or anencephaly. Femur length/ planter foot length ratio is approximately 1 and a ratio of < 0.92 will prove useful in detection of most skeletal dysplasias.

REFERENCES:

  1. Streeter GL. Weight, sitting height, head size, foot length and menstrual age of the human embryo. Contrib embryo Cornegie Inst 1920; 11:143-170.
  2. Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S. The foetal femur/ foot length ratio: A new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988; 72 (2): 181-4.
  3. Mercer BM, Sklar S, Shariatmadar A, Gillieson MS, D Alton ME. Foetal foot length as a predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156 (2):350-5.
  4. Shaley E, Wener R, Zuckerman H & Megory E. Reliability of sonographic measurement of the foetal foot. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 1989; 8 (5): 259-62.
  5. Platt LD, Medearis AL, Gregor DR. Foetal foot length relationship to menstrual age and foetal measurement in 2nd trimester. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 526-31.
  6. Mhaskar R, Agarwal N, Takkar D, Buskshee K, Anandalakshmi, Deorari A. Foetal foot length – a new parameter for assessment of gestational age. Int J Gynaecol and Obstetrics. 1989; 29 (1):35-8.
  7. Drey EA, Kang MS, Mc Farland W, Darney PD. Improving the accuracy of foetal foot length to confirm gestational age. Obstet and Gynecol. 2005; 105 (4):773-78.
  8. Seeds JW. The routine screening obstetrical ultrasound examination. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 34: 825-26.
  9. Hershey DW. The fetal femur foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73:682.
  10. Glance P, Chitayat D, Azouz EM. Foetal musculoskeletal system chap 41, Diagnostic ultrasound 1988 2nd Ed volume 2 Mosby (Missouri) Rumack.
  11. Meirowitz NM, Ananth CV, Similian JC et al. Foetal length in fetuses with abnormal growth. J Ultrasound Medicine. 2000; 19:201-05.

 

    

FIG. 1 & 2: Foetal foot length measurement on plantar and sagital

 

FIG. 3:  Foetal foot and femur lengths at 28 weeks

 

FIG. 4:  Foetal foot and femur length

 

 

Videos :

watch?v