Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(930)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2019 Month : July Volume : 8 Issue : 26 Page : 2047-2050

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE CLINICAL PROFILE AND OUTCOMES OF HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY (HDsP) ADMITTED TO A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ICU.

BabySailaja K1, Renuka M. K2

1Assistant Professor, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medial College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
2Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medial College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Renuka M. K,
Email : renuramanujam@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Corresponding Author:
Dr. Renuka M. K,
Professor,
Department of Anaesthesiology,
Sri Ramachandra Medical College and
Research Institute, Chennai,
Tamilnadu, India.
E-mail: renuramanujam@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDsP) are associated with significant mortality and morbidity of the pregnant patient with wide variations between developed and developing countries. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the magnitude, complications, mortality, and morbidity of patients with HDsP who were admitted to a multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study for two years on all obstetric patients with HDsP shifted to the multidisciplinary ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Demographic profile prevalence of various hypertensive disorders, associated complications, interventions and outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were admitted to the ICU with hypertension complicating pregnancy and carried an ICU mortality rate of 7.3% (n=3). The mean age of the study group was 31.22 ± 6.5 years. Majority of them were primigravidae (59%), in their third trimester (53.7%) and received antenatal care (85.3%). Preeclampsia (n=19) and eclampsia (n=13) accounted for 79% of admission to ICU. Most of them were shifted to ICU during the postpartum period (93%) and 58.6% underwent caesarean section. Haemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, and Low Platelet syndrome (19.5%), Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy syndrome (31.7%) and acute renal failure (22%) were common among the complications. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) were significantly high among the non survivors indicating multiple organ system involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain the most common cause of admission to ICU among the critically ill obstetric patients causing significant mortality and morbidity.

KEY WORDS

Eclampsia, preeclampsia, Intensive care unit, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, PRES

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDsP) are common clinical condition occurring in pregnant patients and are usually associated with a successful pregnancy. It manifests during antenatal or intrapartum period, but postpartum presentation is not unusual. They are supposed to be the cause for maternal mortality in about 14% pregnancies globally.(1)Women at advanced maternal age (Above 35 yrs.), primiparity, multifetal pregnancy, previous history of preeclampsia, underlying chronic hypertension, diabetes, renal disease can pose a risk for the development of hypertension during pregnancy. The most common HDP is preeclampsia-eclampsia. Progression to eclampsia is associated with acute and fatal complications –placental abruption, liver rupture/ hematoma, neurologic

complications like stroke and cortical blindness, disseminated intravascular coagulation, acute pulmonary oedema, cardiorespiratory arrest, acute renal failure. The increased maternal mortality and morbidity were secondary to the development and rapid progression of these serious complications among certain patients. Till date there are no specific prognostic indicators to identify the patients who might progress to such complications. Therefore, these patients often require admission to intensive care unit (ICU) for careful monitoring and early identification of the development of complications.

The objective of managing a patient with HDsP is to stabilize the mother and salvage of fetus should be based on the gestational age at the onset of symptoms of severe preeclampsia. The current approach in the management of HDsP is expectant management after ensuring the maternal and fetal wellness. The current recommendations are oral and intravenous antihypertensives for control of blood pressure, magnesium sulphate administration for prevention and control of seizures and delivery of fetus after maternal stabilisation irrespective of fetal viability in severe disease.(2) Administration of early appropriate therapy were associated with good outcomes.(3) As there is a dearth of data on the clinical profile of obstetric patients with HDsP admitted to the ICU, we intended to conduct a prospective study on the clinical profile and outcomes of this special population who got admitted to our multidisciplinary ICU.

Aims and Objectives

The present study was conducted to assess the magnitude of HDsP among obstetric patients admitted to a multidisciplinary ICU, the associated complications, interventions required, in-hospital mortality and morbidity of the obstetric patients with HDsP admitted to our multidisciplinary ICU.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted for a period of two years on consecutive obstetric patients (pregnant or within six weeks postpartum) with HDsP who required ICU care. Institutional ethics committee approval was obtained to conduct the study. Demographic data pertaining to age, parity, trimester, prenatal care, parturient status at the time of ICU admission, mode of delivery were recorded. Interventions provided in the form of mechanical ventilation, treatment with magnesium sulphate, labetalol, diuretics and transfusion therapy were recorded. Admission day APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II)(4) and worst SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)(5) scores were calculated to assess the severity of illness of the study group. The in-hospital mortality is the primary outcome measured. Average length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, ICU LOS, ventilator days were the secondary outcomes studied.

Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 17) for Microsoft windows was used to analyse the data. The data were expressed as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages and numbers for categorical variables. Further analysis was done by applying Independent samples student t test/ Mann Whitney test for continuous variables and Chi square test for categorical variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the two-year period, out of the 92 obstetric admissions to ICU, 41 patients (44.56%) were found to be complicated with hypertension during pregnancy. The mean age of the study group was 31.22 ± 6.5 years. About 59% (n=24) were primigravidae and 53.7% (n=22) were in their third trimester at the time of admission. Eighty five percent had prenatal care either in our hospital (n=16) or at other facilities (n=19). Almost 93% (n=38) were shifted to ICU during the postpartum period. (Table 1)

Variable

Total (n=41)

Survivors (n = 38)

Non-Survivors (n=3)

p Value

Age(Years), Mean± SD

31.22 ± 6.5

31.18 ± 6.4

31.67 ± 9.0

0.903*

Parity, n (%)

     

1

< 2

24 (58.5)

22 (91.7)

2 (8.3)

 

≥ 2

17 (41.5)

16 (94.1)

1 (5.9)

 

Trimester, n (%)

     

0.136

II Trimester

9 (22)

7 (77.8)

2 (22.2)

 

III Trimester

22 (53.7)

21 (95.5)

1 (4.5)

 

Postpartum

10 (24.4)

10 (100)

0 (0)

 

Prenatal care, n (%)

     

0.674

Booked

16 (39)

15 (93.8)

1 (6.3)

 

Unbooked

6 (14.6)

6 (100)

0 (0)

 

Referred

19 (46.3)

17 (89.5)

2 (10.5)

 

Parturient status, n (%)

     

0.01

Antepartum

3 (7.3)

1 (33.3)

2 (66.7)

 

Postpartum

38 (92.7)

37 (97.4)

1 (2.6)

 

Table 1. Demographic Data of Obstetric Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Admitted to ICU

SD=Standard deviation; *Independent student t test

 

The underlying hypertensive disorder was preeclampsia (58.5%) in majority of the study population followed by chronic hypertension (24.4%). (Table 2) At the time of transfer to ICU, nine patients (33%) with preeclampsia were admitted with eclampsia, seven patients (70%) with chronic hypertension progressed to preeclampsia and one patient developed eclampsia. Underlying Haemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelet (HELLP) syndrome was observed in 19.5% (n=8) patients. Seventy seven percent patients admitted with eclampsia to the ICU showed features of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).(Figure 1)

 

Diagnosis

Total (n=41)

Survivors (n = 38)

Non-Survivors(n=3)

Preeclampsia, n (%)

24 (58.5)

23 (95.8)

1 (4.2)

Chronic Hypertension, n (%)

10 (24.4)

9 (90)

1 (10)

Gestational Hypertension, n (%)

3 (7.3)

2 (66.7)

1 (33.3)

Normotension, n (%)

4 (9.8)

4 (100)

0 (0)

Table 2. Admission Diagnosis Among the Study Population

 

About 60% (n=24) among the ICU transferred patients underwent caesarean delivery. Invasive ventilation and blood transfusion were given in 56% patients each. (Table 3).

 

Intervention

Number (%)

Caesarean Section

24 (58.6)

Mechanical Ventilation

23 (56.1)

Magnesium Sulphate Therapy

15 (36.6)

Labetalol Therapy

15 (36.6)

Blood Transfusion

23 (56.1)

Table 3. Interventions Required by The Study Population

 

The worst SOFA score was significantly high among non survivors (17 ± 3.60 vs 5.18 ± 3.34, p =0.004) suggestive of their progression to multi organ failure. The average hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS and ventilator free days did not show any significant difference among survivors and non survivors. (Table 4)

 

Variable

Survivors

(n=38)

Non-Survivors

(n=3)

p Value

APACHE II, Mean± SD

11.89 ± 7.92

19.33 ± 7.23

0.108

Worst SOFA,

Mean± SD

5.18 ± 3.34

17 ± 3.60

0.004

Hospital LOS (Days)

8.63 ± 4.65

10 ± 6.24

0.58

ICU LOS (Days), Mean± SD

3.11 ± 1.68

8.33 ± 7.02

0.28

ICU Free Days,

Mean± SD

5.53 ± 4.07

1.67 ± 1.52

0.063

Ventilator Days, Mean± SD

2.2 ± 2.0

6.50 ± 5.22

0.265

Ventilator Free Days, Mean± SD

7.47 ± 4.63

3.5 ± 1.32

0.098

Table 4. Severity of Illness Score and Outcomes of Study Population

APACHE=Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SOFA= Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SD=Standard Deviation; LOS= Length of Stay; ICU=Intensive Care Unit; =Mann Whitney Test

 

Acute renal failure and acute pulmonary oedema were the complications that occurred more frequently in our study patients. (Figure 2)

 

DISCUSSION

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG) task force(2) categorises HDsP as chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia-eclampsia and superimposed preeclampsia. The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP)(6) additionally includes white coat hypertension as it increases the risk for preeclampsia.

Hypertension during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal outcomes in short term as well as long term.7 The expected short-term adversities are maternal mortality, caesarean delivery, eclampsia and prolonged hospital stay warranting the management of these critically ill patients in the ICU. They are the leading cause for admission of obstetric patients into ICU and the incidence varied between different countries, 26.83%, (8) 58%, (9) 16.6%(10)and 62.7%.(11) In our study we observed a prevalence of 44.56% and was comparable to the existing data.

Younger or advanced maternal age is a risk factor for development of hypertension during pregnancy.(7, 12) The minimum and maximum age observed in our study population was 21 and 44 years respectively with a mean age of 31 years and is comparable with other studies.(13, 14) Majority of our patients were in their third trimester at the time of onset of illness, similar to that observed by Curiel Balsera et al(14) and Vasquez et al.(15)

Though adequate prenatal care was sought by 85% of our study group, the need for emergent ICU care in these patients may suggest the rapidity of deterioration. Vasquez et al also showed a similar prenatal care in their study.(15)

In our study, majority of patients had a caesarean delivery. This may be probably due to the severity of illness at presentation and lack of adequate time for vaginal delivery. A similar caesarean section rate was observed even in other studies.(10, 14) High incidence of postpartum admission for monitoring the development of complications as observed in our study was noticed in another study.(15)

At the time of ICU transfer, 46.3% (n=19) patients had preeclampsia and another 31.7% (n=13) patients were complicated by eclampsia (31.7%). Of them, eight patients (19.5%) had underlying HELLP syndrome at ICU admission. A similar prevalence of HDsP was observed in the study by Vasquez et al.(15) Almost 80% of chronic hypertensives and all patients with gestational hypertension progressed to either preeclampsia or developed complication in the form of eclampsia. A similarly high rate of progression of these disorders to preeclampsia/eclampsia was demonstrated in a pilot trial by Magee et al.(16)

An unusually high incidence of PRES (31.7%) was present among the eclamptic patients in our study population. Abalos et al described a high prevalence neurological dysfunction including PRES in his study.(12)

The need for invasive ventilation in our study population was similar to the general critically ill obstetric patients getting admitted to ICU.(17) In the present study population due to the serious illness and development of complications the ICU stay was prolonged. This was longer when compared to the ICU stay of general critically ill obstetric patients admitted to ICU as observed in a systemic review by Pollock et al(17) and from other studies.(18,19)

HDsP remains the third leading cause of direct obstetric deaths worldwide.(1) The observed maternal mortality among our special population was 7.3% (n=3) and all progressed to multiple organ failure at the time of death. The incidence of renal dysfunction in HDsP varied from 5% to 24% in various studies.(10, 12, 14) In our study nine patients (22%) had acute kidney injury of which three patients needed renal replacement therapy. Two patients went into cardiac arrest, one following a seizure in the labour ward and the other following acute pulmonary oedema leading to hypoxia during labour. These two patients required tracheostomy due to failed weaning and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy respectively.

In the current study due to the smaller sample size, no conclusions could be drawn regarding the risk factors for the incidence and development of life-threatening complications. Further studies with large sample size are needed to identify the risk factors and to formulate early interventions to prevent mortality and morbidity in this special population.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension during pregnancy still remains an important cause for admission of obstetric patients to the ICU. The unpredictability of progression and development of life-threatening complications in the presence of underlying hypertension, mandates all these patients be recognized early, and be followed by a team management in ICU to reduce the mortality and morbidity.

 

Videos :

watch?v