Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(958)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2018 Month : July Volume : 7 Issue : 29 Page : 3279-3284

CLINICAL PROFILE OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS) IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE/ HOSPITAL.

Hemant R. Gupta1, Akhilesh Patidar2, Utina Kichu3, Anish Kamble4

1Associate Professor and Unit Head, Department of Medicine, Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, JJ Group of Hospital and Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
3Junior Resident, Department of Medicine, JJ Group of Hospital and Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
4Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, JJ Group of Hospital and Grant Government Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Hemant R. Gupta,
Email : drhemantgupta@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Corresponding Author:
Dr. Hemant R. Gupta,
#203, Erica Dosti Acres Complex,
Near Antop Hill Bus Depot,
Wadala (E), Antop Hill, Mumbai-400037,
Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drhemantgupta@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

ARDS is considered as the most severe form of acute lung injury, a form of diffuse alveolar injury and a leading cause of death in critical care settings.

Aims and Objectives-

  • To analyse the ARDS cases in admitted patients with special reference to risk factors associated with poor prognosis.
  • To study the aetiology of ARDS.
  • To study severity and outcome of ARDS cases.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was an observational study. It included 80 patients of ARDS, which are fulfilling diagnostic criteria according to Berlin definitions 2012. The study period was 1 year.

RESULTS

In critically ill patients who were hospitalised in Critical Care Units (CCU), the prevalence of ARDS has been estimated at about 5-15% of patients. In our study period, there were 800 admissions with prevalence of ARDS of 12.50%. Our results are consistent with those of Roupie et al, who reported a twice higher mortality (60%) in patients with ARDS than that recorded in patients with mild ALI (31%). Pulmonary infection (37.5%) followed by Dengue (23.75%) were the most common causes for ARDS in this study. In our study, sepsis was the predominant indirect cause of ARDS with 35 out of 80 patients of Dengue, i.e. 19 (23.75%). There was a significant association between severity of ARDS and various aetiological groups with p-value of 0.0001. Patients with ARDS had lower PO2, lower PO2/FiO2 ratio, severe metabolic acidosis, higher serum creatinine, higher blood urea nitrogen and worsened critical scores including GCS scoring, lower systolic blood pressure and lower mean arterial pressure.

 

CONCLUSION

  1. Prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome is quite common in ICU setting.
  2. Pulmonary infection was the most common non-tropical direct cause of ARDS, while sepsis was the most common cause of indirect ARDS.
  3. Dengue, Malaria and Leptospirosis were most common tropical causes of ARDS.
  4. Factors that showed association with mortality-
  • Aetiology had significant association with outcome.
  • Anaemia, tachycardia, raised ESR and high WBC count had significant association with outcome.
  • Deranged serum creatinine and decreased urine output had significant association with outcome.
  • Low systolic blood pressure and low diastolic blood pressure was significantly associated with poor outcome.
  • Duration of ventilator support was associated with mortality significantly.
  • Culture positivity was associated significantly with mortality.

KEY WORDS

ARDS.

BACKGROUND

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) was first described in 1967 in twelve patients presenting with acute respiratory failure that was refractory to oxygen therapy with decreased pulmonary compliance and diffuse infiltrates on chest x-rays.1 Although, this syndrome was given a name (at that time, “adult respiratory distress syndrome”), there was no well-established criteria for its diagnosis.

In 1988, a lung injury score was created in order to diagnose and evaluate ARDS severity, taking into account four parameters: chest x-ray, hypoxia through the oxygen tension/ fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, pulmonary compliance and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).2

It was not until 1994 that the American European Consensus Conference on ARDS established diagnostic criteria for ARDS, defining it as a “syndrome of inflammation and increased pulmonary capillary permeability accompanied by a large number of clinical, radiological and physiological abnormalities, which are not caused by pulmonary capillary hypertension but may coexist with it.”3 On that occasion, Acute Lung Injury (ALI) was defined as a clinical profile of acute respiratory failure with bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray. No left atrial hypertension (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure less than 18 mmHg) and hypoxaemia presenting an arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio less than or equal to 300. If this ratio is less than or equal to 200, the patient is considered ARDS.

Since the 1994 American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, at which the diagnostic criteria were redefined, the number of epidemiological studies has been steadily growing. In Intensive Care Units (ICUs), ARDS is seen in 2% to 26% of all hospitalised patients and the highest rates are observed among patients on mechanical ventilation.4-8,9 In a recent analysis of the ARDS Network Database, Goss et al estimated the incidence of ARDS in the US at 64 per 100,000.10 In critically ill patients hospitalised in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), the prevalence of ALI/ARDS has been estimated at about 5 - 15% of patients.(11,9,12,13)

The principal risk factors for development of lung injury that have been identified since the first studies on ARDS carried out were sepsis, pneumonia, aspiration of gastric content, multiple trauma and shock due to multiple transfusions.14-17 This finding has been confirmed in more recent studies.6,7,8,18 In a study of 217 ARDS cases in Argentina,19 sepsis, pneumonia, shock and trauma were found to be the most frequent risk factors.

The Seattle study included three markers of severe trauma including multiple transfusions for emergency resuscitation (15U within a 24-h period), multiple bone fractures or an unstable pelvic fracture and lung contusion. Of these, the category of multiple transfusions was associated with the highest incidence of ARDS 35%. Of interest, multiple transfusions were also associated with a 35% incidence of ARDS when they occurred in medicine service patients without trauma. Long bone fractures were associated with the lowest incidence of ARDS of these three (11%), whereas the incidence associated with lung contusion was intermediate (22%). Patients with trauma including any or a combination of these three definitions had an overall ARDS incidence of 25.5%.

On ALIVE study, it was found that mortality was independently associated with age and one variable reflecting underlying disease (immunoincompetence) with the severity of acute pulmonary and non-pulmonary organ failures (as reflected by the SAPS II and LOD scores) with acidosis (pH<7.30) and the occurrence of early barotrauma.

 

Objectives

  1. To analyse the ARDS cases admitted patients with special reference to risk factors associated with poor prognosis.
  2. To study the aetiology of ARDS.
  3. To study severity and outcome of ARDS cases.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was an observational study. 80 patients were included in the ARDS cohort, when meeting for the first time the consensus criteria for ARDS and not having any of the exclusion factors. Patients were classified as having ARDS when the worst PaO2/ FiO2 ratio recorded within the first 24 hours of inclusion was 300 or less.

 

Diagnostic Criteria(3)

Acute onset of respiratory distress with a relevant clinical setting-

  1. Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2 mmHg)/ fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio < 300.
  2. Bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray.
  3. An initial pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 18 mmHg or no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension or congestive cardiac failure at the time of presentation.

 

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Age < 13 years.
  2. History of ischaemic heart disease or valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathies including diastolic dysfunction.
  3. Patients having signs/ symptoms of cardiac failure like raised jugular venous pressure, raised central venous pressure and radiological features of high pressure oedema (cardiomegaly, dilated upper lobe vessels, Kerley’s lines, central lung shadowing with absence of air bronchogram), ECG suggestive of ischaemic heart disease or accelerated hypertension or hypertensive heart disease as documented by 2D echo.
  4. Chronic respiratory failure or patients with moderate-to-severe restrictive or Obstructive Lung Function. (COPD, ILD, lung resection, pulmonary tuberculosis active or old with fibrosis and destruction of lung parenchyma).
  5. Death within 4 hours of admission.

 

A data collection of 80 patients is done in prospective and randomised manner and from a critical care unit in a tertiary care centre/ hospital. A minimum data set including demographic (age and gender) admission characteristics and discharge information (outcome, cause of death) was collected of all patients. This included demographic characteristics, the patient source (hospital, ward emergency or operating room or transfer), variables used for calculation of acute physiology and chronic health score (APACHE III), underlying diseases including immunoincompetence and its causes and the presence of chronic organ failure and comorbid conditions like diabetes mellitus, alcoholic liver disease etc. This comprised documentation of the diagnostic criteria for the syndrome, the primary cause(s) of ARDS and whether the initial insult was pulmonary (“Direct”) or non-pulmonary (“Indirect”).

Statistical analysis was done using patient related variables as well as process of care variables. Patient related variables included age, gender, diagnosis at the time of hospital admission, immunosuppression associated comorbid conditions and pO2/ FiO2 ratio, while process of care variable included ventilatory support and settings, CCU stay, development of organ failure and outcome from CCU. For statistical analysis, patient having more than one diagnosis were put in one category. Patients developing sepsis irrespective of primary diagnosis like pneumonia were labelled as sepsis.

The data was studied and statistically treated. The univariate analysis was done using chi-square/ Fisher test and simple percentage. The test of significance was set < 0.05. T test was done to test two groups where required.

 

RESULTS

For the present study, 80 patients were observed in medical CCU of tertiary care hospital and their outcomes for different categories under the requirement of study are as follows:

Out of 80 patients included in study 29 died, while 51 recovered completely.

Age Group

Outcome

Total

Chi-Square

P value

Recovered

Death

N

(%)

N

(%)

<20 years

1

20

4

80

05

8.76

0.03

20 - 40 years

29

78.38

8

21.62

37

41 - 60 years

17

54.84

14

45.16

31

>60 years

4

57.14

3

42.86

07

Table 1. Age distribution of Patients as per Outcome

 

The maximum number of patients died from the age group of 40 to 60 years that were 14 (45.16%) and minimum number of patients died from age group > 60 years that were 3 (42.86%), while maximum percentage of patients died from the age group < 20 years that is 80%.

 

Sex

Outcome

Total

Chi-Square

P value

Recovered

Death

N

(%)

N

(%)

Female

22

57.90

16

42.10

38

1.07

0.30

Male

29

69.00

13

31.00

42

Table 2. Sex distribution of Patients

 

ARDS Severity Distribution

 

Figure 1. ARDS Severity Distribution


Out of 80 cases 20 were mild, 51 were moderate and 9 cases were severe ARDS.

 

 

PO2/

FiO2

Severity

Recovered

Death

Total

Chi-Square Test

P value

Mild

16 (80.00%)

4 (20.00%)

20

5.92

0.05

Moderate

32 (62.75%)

19 (37.25%)

51

Severe

3 (33.33%)

6 (66.67%)

9

Total

51 (63.75%)

29 (36.25%)

80

Table 3

 

From the table it is clear that out of 80 patients, maximum mortality were found in severe ARDS 66.67%, while minimum found in mild ARDS 20%.

Sl.

No.

Suspected

Aetiology

Outcome

Total

Recovered

Death

N

(%)

N

(%)

1

Aspiration

0

0.00

5

100.00

5

2

Burn

0

0.00

1

100.00

1

3

Dengue

18

94.70

1

5.30

19

4

Leptospirosis

0

0.00

3

100.00

3

5

Malaria

4

66.70

2

33.30

6

6

Malaria + Dengue

2

100.00

0

0.00

2

7

Pancreatitis

1

100.00

0

0.00

1

8

Poisoning

0

0.00

2

100.00

2

9

Pulmonary Infection

25

83.30

5

16.70

30

10

Sepsis

1

10.00

9

90.00

10

11

Transfusion Reaction

0

0.00

1

100.00

1

Table 4. Aetiology Distribution

 

Pulmonary infection was the most common cause of ARDS in our study with highest number of cases (30) with 16.70% of mortality followed by Dengue (19 cases) with mortality of 5.30%. ARDS secondary to Sepsis associated with 90.00% mortality. Malaria (6 cases) as a cause of ARDS was found with 33.30% mortality. However, the less common causes of ARDS like Aspiration, Burn, Leptospira, Poisoning and Transfusion Reaction was associated with 100% mortality. The highest cases of recovery was found in dengue ARDS.

It was found that the clinical outcome in terms of mortality significantly different among different aetiologies with p-value < 0.0001.

 

Tracheal/

Sputum

Culture

Outcome

Total

Recovered

Death

N

(%)

N

(%)

Acinetobacter

1

7.10%

13

92.90%

14

H. influenza

0

0.00%

7

100.00%

07

Klebsiella

10

83.30%

2

16.70%

12

MRSA

4

66.70%

2

33.30%

6

Pneumococci

7

87.50%

1

12.50%

08

No Growth

29

87.90%

4

12.10%

33

Table 5. Tracheal/ Sputum Culture versus Outcome

 

Chi-Square= 44.003; P-value < 0.0001

 

Tracheal or Sputum culture has been done in 80 patients and found to be positive in 47 (58.75%). 25 (53.19%) culture positive patient have died, while 22 patients (46.80%) have been recovered. 14 patients (29.78%) were found to be culture positive for Acinetobacter and only 1 patient has been recovered. Statistical analysis of culture positivity and outcome showed significant correlation with p-value <0.0001.

 

X-Ray on Admission

Recovered

Death

Total

Bilateral Infiltrate

32

24

56

Normal

19

5

24

Table 6. X-ray on admission with Features of ARDS

 

Cases with x-ray suggestive of bilateral infiltrate on admission were 56, while the first x-ray study was normal among 24 cases.

 

 

 

 

 


Variables

Outcome

 

T-test

P-value

Recovered

Death

 

Mean

SD

Median

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Median

Min

Max

Age

40

14

38

19

72

41

17

46

15

72

0.21

0.84

Resp. Rate

25

6

24

14

36

27

8

28

14

38

1.42

0.16

SBP

118

15

118

90

148

102

19

98

76

142

4.08

0.0001

DBP

68

9

70

50

86

62

9

60

50

80

3.21

0.002

HR

100

15

100

70

130

111

20

112

78

144

2.68

0.009

Temp

99.91

2.11

99.4

96.2

104.6

101.1

4.63

100.4

96

122

1.56

0.12

Hb

11.55

1.41

11.5

7.7

14.4

10.62

2.14

10.6

6.6

16.4

2.34

0.02

WBC

8986

3281

8000

3000

16500

12234

5461

13500

3200

26000

3.33

0.0013

ESR

30

19

24

10

110

40

23

38

10

110

2.05

0.04

Platelets

201824

120681

164000

32000

450000

264655

385557

142000

26000

1700000

1.08

0.28

Creatinine

0.91

0.44

0.9

0.2

2.4

2.06

1.46

1.7

0.2

6.1

5.25

<0.0001

Urea

24

12

21

12

88

44

23

36

14

90

5.01

<0.0001

Na+

134

16

136

33

151

127

20

129

32

144

1.78

0.08

K+

4.22

0.74

4.2

2.2

5.5

4.22

1.19

4.2

2.5

6.5

0.01

0.99

SGOT

86

91

64

18

540

85

103

60

16

540

0.05

0.96

SGPT

121

121

85

16

740

154

154

80

24

540

1.05

0.29

PO2/ FiO2

171

27

180

80

196

159

41

174

80

196

1.57

0.12

Albumin

4.22

0.74

4.2

2.2

5.5

4.22

1.19

4.2

2.5

6.5

0.01

0.99

Urine Input

2400

599

2400

1200

3600

1959

570

2000

1000

3200

3.22

0.002

Urine Output

1831

600

1900

600

3200

1164

706

1000

100

2800

4.48

<0.0001

GCS

15

0

15

15

15

13

3

15

6

15

4.42

<0.0001

Ventilator

Invasive

Mode (Days)

3

2

3

0

8

6

2

6

3

11

6.83

<0.0001

Ventilator

Non-Invasive

Mode (Days)

3

1

3

1

5

1

1

1

0

3

7.05

<0.0001

Ventilator

Total (Days)

6

2

6

2

10

7

2

6

4

13

3.34

0.0013

ICU Stay (Days)

9

2

8

5

14

8

2

8

4

13

1.71

0.09

Table 7. Various Parameters and their association with ARDS

 


DISCUSSION

All the patients included in our study had acute respiratory distress syndrome with pO2/FiO2 ratio < 300. Severity of ARDS and its association and correlation with various factors pertaining to patient himself, the illness causing admission to medical intensive care unit and outcome in the form of survival were studied.

Our study was carried in exclusive medical intensive care unit and all surgical patients including trauma patients were not considered.

In critically ill patients hospitalised in critical care units (CCU), the prevalence of ARDS has been estimated at about 5-15% of patients.11,9,12,13 In our study period, there were 800 admissions with prevalence of ARDS 12.50%. In our study, overall mortality was 36.25%.

In the recent International survey of mechanically ventilated patients, the ICU mortality rate of the 231 patients with ARDS on ICU admission was 52%.9 In other single-centre epidemiological studies of unselected patients, mortality rates still appear to be greater than 50%.12,13,20 Our results were consistent with these studies.

Our results are consistent with those of Roupie et al, who reported a twice higher mortality (60%) in patients with ARDS than that recorded in patients with mild ALI (31%). They differ however from those reported in two recent population-based studies, where the mortality rates of ARDS were similar at about 40% or lower.18,11 Exclusion of trauma-related ARDS cases, which usually have better prognosis would be the possible explanation for this result.

ARDS appears to be more common with increasing age in patients with similar underlying risk conditions,16,21 (Hudson et al and Artigas et al).

In our study, patients with all age group above 13 had developed acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, there was no significant difference in survival among various age groups. The mean age of the patients enrolled in our study was 40 yrs. There was a statistically significant relation seen in mortality with age group of less than 20 years. A significant association between age and mortality has been shown in several studies. However, in a study conducted in North India by Agarwal et al22 it was observed that when patient aged more than 50 years were compared to younger patients, the outcome was not significantly different.

In our study, out of 80 patients 42 (52.5%) were male patients and 38 (47.5%) were female patients. As per previous studies, gender appears to have no effect on the likelihood of developing ARDS given similar risk conditions.16,23 Our results were consistent with these studies.

The specific infections related to severe sepsis vary considerably by geographic area. For example, leptospirosis is a common cause of ARDS in Brazil23 and also in Thailand, India and other tropical countries, but not in the United States or Western Europe.

Pulmonary infection (37.5%) followed by Dengue (23.75%) were the most common causes for ARDS in this study. A study conducted by Vigg et al in Hyderabad had made similar observations with primary pulmonary infection being the most common cause of ARDS. In 43.75% of the patients in the study ARDS could be attributed to direct causes, predominantly pulmonary infection. Ninety five percent of the cases of ARDS in this study were secondary to infectious causes. Our results were consistent with this study.

In our study, sepsis was the predominant indirect cause of ARDS with 35 out of 80 patients of Dengue, i.e. 19 (23.75%). Sepsis was the next leading causes of ARDS contributing 12.5%. Other major causes of ARDS were Malaria and Leptospirosis contributing 10.25%.

Direct causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome were pneumonia and aspiration together contributing to 43.75% of patients. Among indirect non-pulmonary non-tropical causes sepsis was the most common, causing acute ARDS in 10 (12.5%) patients.

Other causes which contributed to acute respiratory distress syndrome was poisoning (2), Burn (1) and Transfusion Reaction (1).

A number of factors related to underlying conditions, aetiologies, severity of lung injury, non-pulmonary organ failure and management have been identified in outcome studies of ARDS.9,12,13,21,24,25,26 The principal variables influencing outcome appear to be chronic liver disease12,20 and immunodepression,12,13,21 sepsis (OR= 2.8)13,20 and the occurrence of non-pulmonary organ dysfunction.13,21,25

In our study, significant association was seen between mortality and aetiology of ARDS. Mortality was 27.30% in patients with alcoholic liver disease. One study has found that chronic alcoholism carries an increased risk of development of ARDS, given similar risk conditions as observed by Moss M, Bucher B, Moore FA et al (1996).

Patients with ARDS had lower PO2, lower pO2/FiO2 ratio, severe metabolic acidosis, higher serum creatinine, higher blood urea nitrogen and worsened critical scores including GCS scoring, lower systolic blood pressure and lower mean arterial pressure.

A low pH was associated with increased mortality points to the adverse impact of metabolic acidosis on outcome. This finding probably reflects circulatory failure and underlying severity.

This observation supports the previous literature and postulations that ARDS is part of a systemic syndrome, now called multiple organ failure, in which the lung features heavily but may also include renal failure and injury to liver, gut and skin.26

In patients with ARDS, most of the deaths occurred in six to ten days suggesting rapid course of underlying pathology. The fact that most cases of ARDS occur quickly after the onset of the clinical predisposition underscores the potential need for rapid intervention in these patients.

A study conducted by Michelle Ng Gong had noted that the number of units of blood products transfused were significantly higher in the group of patients that died compared to those that recovered. This apparent increase in mortality amongst patients transfused larger volumes of blood products, may be either because this group has a greater degree of organ dysfunction thus necessitating transfusions or may indicate that the transfusions have contributed to the lung injury. Our study showed that there was significant association between number of blood products transfused and mortality (p-value 0.004).

In this study, there was microbiological growth in trachea or sputum cultures were taken in 100% patients. Where 58.75% patients were having microbial growth, out of which 53.19% patients died. This culture positivity was significantly associated with mortality (p-value 0.0001).

Patients with ARDS were put on ventilator with guidelines from recent ARDS network trial with all patients initially put on assist control volume control pressure support mode with initial tidal volume 6 mg per kg body weight. PEEP was increased whenever possible to increase PaO2 and decrease requirement of FiO2, so as to keep FiO2 at or below 60 and to keep end inspiratory plateau pressure <30 cm H2O. All patients included in this study required ventilator support.

 

Limitations

  • The relatively small number of ARDS cases that we were able to document.
  • It is possible that we missed some patients with our defined clinical risk conditions.
  • Left atrial pressure was not directly measured causing exclusion of large number of patients.
  • Long-term morbidity and mortality were not studied.
  • Study was only observational and non-interventional.
  • Because of the overwhelming nature of the lung injury, once it is established, prevention would appear to be the most effective strategy for improving the outlook in this condition.

 

CONCLUSION

  1. Prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome is quite common in ICU setting.
  2. Pulmonary infection was the most common non-tropical direct cause of ARDS, while sepsis was the most common cause of indirect ARDS.
  3. Dengue, Malaria and Leptospirosis were most common tropical causes of ARDS.
  4. Factors that showed association with mortality-
  • Aetiology had significant association with outcome.
  • Anaemia, tachycardia, raised ESR and high WBC count had significant association with outcome.
  • Deranged serum creatinine and decreased urine output had significant association with outcome.
  • Low systolic blood pressure and low diastolic blood pressure were significantly associated with poor outcome.
  • Duration of ventilator support was associated with mortality significantly.
  • Culture positivity was associated significantly with mortality.


Videos :

watch?v