Retrospective Evaluation of Caesarean Section by Robsons Ten Group Classification System (RTGC) System in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

World Health Organisation. Statement on Caeserean Section rates. 2015. WHO Reference Number: WHO/RHR/15.02.2015.

Prameela RC, Farha A, Bhanumati PM, et al. Analysis of caesarean section rate in a tertiary hospital according to Robson’s 10 Group Classification System (TGCS). IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2015;14(2):46-9.           

Hans P, Rohatgi R. Proposing a hybrid model based on Robson’s classification for better impact on trends of caesarean deliveries. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2017;67(3):183-9.              

Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The ten-group Robson classification: a single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Article ID 56448938, Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2017;2017: p. 5.           

Farine D, Shepherd D, Meternal Fetal Medicine Commitee. SOGC Committee Opinion. Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the modified Robson criteria. No. 281, October 2012. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2012;34(10):976-9.              

Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of Robson’s classification to assess the caesarean section trends in 21 countries: secondary analysis of two WHO Multicountry surveys. Lancet Global Health 2015:3(5):e260-70.             

Anuradha J, Vani I, Sreevalli M. A critical analysis of caesarean section rates in government hospital at Visakhapatnam according to WHO Robson’s Criteria. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 2015;2(12):83-6.               

Dhodapkar SB, Bhairavi S, Daniel M, et al. Analysis of caesarean sections according to Robson’s ten group classification system at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2015;4(3):745-9.                     

Amita R, Jose S. Analysis of caesarean - section rates according to Robson’s ten group classification system and evaluating the indications within the groups. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6(2):447-51.                      

Neville G, Robson M. Caesarean section rates: much do about nothing or a marker of quality care? In: Studd J, Tan SL, Chervenac FA, eds. Current progress in obstetrics and gynaecology. Vol. 2. 1st edn. Mumbai: Tree life Media, Kothari Medical Subscription Services Private Ltd., 2014: p. 151-61.