SEARCH ARTICLES



LATEST ARTICLES

Table of Contents

2017 Month : October Volume : 6 Issue : 84 Page : 5879-5883

THE CHANGING CONCEPTS IN THE RETENTION OF MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS FROM PAST TO PRESENT- A REVIEW.

Hema Kanathila1, Ashwin Pangi2

1Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, KAHE s KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences.
2Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Vasantdada Patil Dental College, Sangli.

References :

1

Deba K. Oral & Maxillofacial Prosthetics-I: Objectives & History. Heal Talk 2012;4(5).               

CrossRef |
2

Karthikeyan I, Khatree M, Gaddale R, et al. A review on prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillofacial region. Journal of Scientific Dentistry 2016;6(1):6-12.        

CrossRef |
3

Karthikeyan I, Khatree M, Gaddale R, et al. A review on prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillofacial region. Journal of Scientific Dentistry 2016;6(1):6-12.          

CrossRef |
4

Gurjar R, Kumar SMV, Rao H, et al. Retentive aids in maxillofacial prosthodontics - a review. IJCD 2011:2(3);84-8.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
5

Yeshwante B, Patil SJ, Baig N. Retentive aids used in maxillofacial prosthesis. IJCDS 2014;5(2):12-20.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
6

Kiat-Amnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, et al. Effect of adhesive retention of maxillofacial prostheses. Part 2: time and reapplication effects. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(5):438-41.                       

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
7

Bhat VS, Shenoy KK, Premkumar P, et al. Magnets in dentistry. AMHS 2013;1(1):73-9.                

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
8

Robinson JE. Magnets for the retention of a sectional intraoral prosthesis: a case history. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13(6):1167-71.      

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
9

 Matsumura H, Kawasaki K. Magnetically connected removable sectional denture for a maxillary defect with severe undercut: a clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000;84(1):22-6.              

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
10

Highton R, Caputo AA, Pezzoli M, et al. Retentive characteristics different magnetic systems for dental applications. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(1):104-6.                    

Google Scholar | PubMed
11

Tsutsui H, Kinouchi Y, Sasaki H, et al. Studies on the Sm-Co magnet as a dental material. J Dent Res 1979;58(6):1597-606.    

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
12

Grant GT, Taft RM, Wheeler ST. Practical application of polyurethane and Velcro in maxillofacial prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(3):281-3.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
13

Yoshida K, Takagi A, Tsuboi Y, et al. Modified hygienic Epitec System abutment for magnetic retention of orbital prostheses. J Prosthodont 2008;17(3):219-22     

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
14

Lakshmi NS, Bharathi M, Sujitha K, et al. Magnets and their role in prosthodontics. International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research 2016;3(1):155-7.   

CrossRef |
15

Javid N. The use of magnets in maxillofacial prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1971;25(3):334-41.                   

Google Scholar | PubMed
16

Voigt A, Christ S, Klein M. Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone anchored auricular facial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37(7):664-8.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
17

Federick DR. A magnetically retained interim maxillary obturator. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1976;36(6):671-5.                 

Google Scholar | PubMed
18

Hatami M, Badrian H, Samanipoor S, et al. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with maxillary obturator. Case Reports in Dentistry Article ID 406410, 2013;2013: p.  5.          

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
19

Basavakumar M, Neeraj C, Ramesh C, et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of hemi mandibulectomy patient with magnet retained overdenture - a case report. Int Journal of Clinical Dental Science 2010;1(1):30-2.             

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
20

Pattanaik S, Wadkar AP. Rehabilitation of a patient with intra oral prosthesis and an extra oral orbital prosthesis retained with magnets. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2012;12(1):45-50.                        

Google Scholar | PubMed
21

Banerjee S, Kumar S, Bera A, et al. Magnet retained intraoral-extra oral combination prosthesis: a case report. The J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4(4):235-8.                   

Google Scholar | PubMed
22

Nagaraj E, Shetty M, Krishna PD. Definitive magnetic nasal prosthesis for partial nasal defect. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(4):597-9.          

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
23

Muddugangadhar BC, Sonika R, Chheda PS, et al. Rehabilitation of an orbital defect: a simplified technique. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(7):121-3. 

Google Scholar | PubMed
24

Kantola R. Use of fibre-reinforced composite framework and thermochromic pigment in facial prosthesis. Turun Yliopisto University of Turku. Turku 2014: p. 13.

25

Parel SM, Tjellström A. The United States and Swedish experience with osseointegration and facial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(1):75-9.     

PubMed
26

Watson RM, Coward TJ, Forman GH. Results of treatment of 20 patients with implants-retained auricular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(4):445-9.              

Google Scholar | PubMed
27

Arcuri MR, Rubenstein JT. Facial implants. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42(1):161-75.        

PubMed
28

Hooper SM, Westcott T, Evans PLL, et al. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient options. J Prosthodont 2005;14:32-7.                   

Google Scholar |
29

Fortin Y, Sullivan RM, Rangert BR. The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4(2):69-77.                

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
30

Cariati P, Solis JF, De Perceval MP, et al. Reconstruction of mid-facial defects using facial prostheses supported by dental implants. J Aesthet & Reconstr Surg 2016;2(2):14.              

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
31

Aydin C, Karakoca S, Yilmaz H, et al. Implant- retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21(3)241-4.               

Google Scholar | PubMed
32

Yoon HI, Han JS. Prosthetic rehabilitation with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing dental technology for a patient with a mandibulectomy: a clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2016;115(2):133-6.           

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
33

Ozturk NA, Usumez A, Tosun Z, et al. Implant-retained auricular prosthesis: a case report. European Journal of Dentistry 2010;4(1):71-4.                     

Google Scholar | PubMed
34

Kim MM. Use of customized polyetheretheretone (PEE) implants in the reconstruction of comple maxillofacial defects. Arch Facial Plas Surg 2009;11(1):53-7.

35

Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016;60(1):12-9.                                   

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
36

Herford AS, Miller M, Lauritano F, et al. The use of virtual surgical planning and navigation in the treatment of orbital trauma. Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2017;20(1):9-13.                            

Google Scholar | PubMed