SEARCH ARTICLES



LATEST ARTICLES

Table of Contents

2016 Month : December Volume : 5 Issue : 99 Page : 7224-7230

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION NAILING VERSUS DYNAMIC HIP SCREW DEVICE IN THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES.

Pereddy Somashekhara Reddy1, Nikhil Ponugoti2, Venkata S. Jampana3

1Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad.
2Registrar, Department of Orthopaedics, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad.
3Senior Registrar, Department of Orthopaedics, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad.

References :

1

Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, et al. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86(1):86-94.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
2

Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, et al. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16(6):386-393.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
3

Pan X-h, Xiao D-m, Lin B-w. Dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur in elderly patients. Chin J Orthop Trauma 2004;7:785-789.

4

Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A, et al. A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125(7):462–468.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
5

Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, et al. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 2005;87(1):76-81.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
6

Shen H-m, Liang C-w, Fan Y-q. The clinical study of the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly with DHS, Gamma nail and PFN. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine 2007;2:226-228.

7

Zhao C, Liu DY, Guo JJ, et al. Comparison of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw for treating intertrochanteric fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2009;22(7):535–537.

Google Scholar | PubMed
8

Dahl E. Mortality and life expectancy after hip fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51(1):163-170.

Google Scholar | PubMed
9

Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Speitling A, et al. 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:133.

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
10

Nuber S, Schnweiss T, Rter A. Stabilisierung von instabilen trochantren Mehrfragmentfrakturen Vergleich zwischen PFN und DHS mit Trochanterabsttzplatte. Unfallchirurg 2003;106(1):39-47.

CrossRef | Google Scholar |
11

Klinger HM, Baums MH, Eckert M, et al. A comparative study of unstable per- and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs. proximal femoral nail (PFN). Zentralbl Chir 2005;130(4):301–306.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
12

Knobe M, Münker R, Sellei RM, et al. Unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures. Failure rate, lag screw sliding and outcome with extra- and intramedullary devices (PCCP, DHS and PFN). Z Orthop Unfall 2009;147(3):306–313.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
13

Guerra MTE, Pasqualin S, Souza MP, et al. Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques. Injury 2014;45(Suppl 5):S26-31.

CrossRef | Google Scholar | PubMed
14

Kudłacik K, Jesse L, Gagaczowski T. Intramedullary osteosynthesis with gamma nail in treatment of peritrochanteric fractures of the femur. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2008;10(6):566–575.

 

Google Scholar |