Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(1087)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2014 Month : April Volume : 3 Issue : 18 Page : 4799-4807

PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES FOR VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA: CHALLENGES AND CONTROVERSIES

Lakshmi Mahajan1, Ruchi Gupta2, Anita Kumari3, Vaneet Kohli4, Gifty Singh5

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab.
2. Professor and HOD, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab.
3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab.
4. 2nd Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab.
5. 1st Year Post Graduate Student, Department of Anaesthesia, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Amritsar, Punjab.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Lakshmi Mahajan,
Email : drlakshmimahajan@mail.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Lakshmi Mahajan,
#75, Medical Enclave,
Circular Road,
Amritsar, Punjab.
E-mail: drlakshmimahajan@mail.com

ABSTRACT: Ventilator associated pneumonia continues to be a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. VAP is the second most common nosocomial infection in intensive care units, affecting 27% of all critically ill patients. In the last ten years, American, Canadian, European and Irish scientific societies have documented their evidence based guidelines on the prevention of VAP. The intent of this article is to provide concise and practical knowledge for the bedside clinicians in ICU to aid in VAP prevention efforts. It also focuses on the controversies with regard to diagnostic tools and approaches, treatment plans and prevention strategies.

KEYWORDS: Ventilator associated pneumonia; anaesthesia; guidelines; strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator associated pneumonia is defined as pneumonia occurring more than 48 hours after patient has been intubated and received mechanical ventilation. Eighty-six percent of nosocomial pneumonias associated with mechanical ventilation are termed as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Mortality caused due to VAP is significantly high (13% to 55%). The organisms recovered have an impact on outcome, with higher mortality rates seen in VAP caused by Pseudomonasaeruginosa, Acinetobacter and Stenotrophomonasmaltophilia.1 Beyond mortality, the economics of VAP include increased ICU length of stay (LOS) (from 4 to 13 days), and incremental costs associated with VAP has been estimated at between $5, 000 and $20, 000 per diagnosis.2-4

 However, VAP is preventable and many practices have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of VAP and its associated burden ofillness.5, 6 To establish diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia is really a challenge in critically ill patients because of the presence of underlying cardiopulmonary disorders like aspulmonarycontusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis and the nonspecific radiographic and clinical signs associated with this infection. Diagnosis of VAP requires special emphasis on clinical signs combined with radiographic examination, and microbiologic analysis.

A new streamlined surveillance definition for ventilator-associated pneumonia includes:

Any one of the following

  • Opacity, infiltrate, or consolidation that appears, evolves, or persists over > 72 hours.
  • Cavitation.

Any one of the following

  • Temperature >100.4°F within past 24 hrs.
  • Leucopenia<4, 000 or leucocytosis >12, 000 white blood cells/mm3 within past 24 hours.

Both of the following

  • Two days of stable or decreasing daily minimum FIO2 followed by increase in daily minimum FIO2 >15 points sustained for >2 calendar days OR 2 days of stable or decreasing daily minimum positive end-expiratory pressure followed by increase in daily minimum positive end-expiratory pressure by >2.5 cm H2O sustained for >2 calendar days and.
  • Gram-negative stain of respiratory secretions with moderate (2+) or more neutrophils per low-power field within 72 hrs.

It may be early or late onset depending upon the time of onset. Early onset is defined as pneumonia occurring less than 96 hours of intubation or ICU admission. It is community acquired, antibiotic sensitive having good prognosis and outcome. The causative micro-organisms generally are streptococcus pneumonia, haemophilusinfluenzae and staphylococcus aureus. Late onset type occurs more than 96 hours of intubation or ICU admission. It is hospital acquired, antibiotic resistant having poor prognosis. The pathogens responsible are pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), acitenobacter and enterobacter.

Various strategies have been investigated in order to reduce the incidence of VAP. Almost a decade ago, an education based program at Barnes-Jewish Hospital directed towards respiratory care practitioners and ICU nurses was developed by a multidisciplinary task force to highlight correct practices for the prevention of VAP.7 Lansford et al8 also developed a simple bundle for the prevention of VAP in trauma patients, focusing on head of bed elevation, oral cleansing with chlorhexidine, a once-daily respiratory therapist-driven weaning attempt, and conversion of nasogastric to orogastric feeding tubes. Elements of this bundle also have been shown to be effective in other surgical/trauma units at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.9 Boudama et al10 recently publisheda multimodal intervention strategy for VAP prevention with a strong emphasison process control. This French intervention included a multidisciplinary taskforce, an educational session, and direct observations with performance feedback, technical improvements and scheduledreminders. Bouadma’s eight evidence-based bundled interventions includes Hand hygiene, preferably alcohol-based hand-rubbing; Glove & gown use for endotracheal tube manipulation; Back-rest elevation of 30 to 45 degrees; racheal cuff pressure maintenance 20 cm H2O; Use of orogastric tubes; Avoidance of gastric over distension; Oral hygiene with chlorhexidine; Elimination of nonessential tracheal suction.

All these strategies are likely to be successful only if based upon a sound understanding of pathogenesis and epidemiology. The major route for acquiring VAP is oropharyngeal colonization by endogenous flora or by pathogens acquired exogenously from the intensive care unit environment, especially the hands or apparel of health-care workers, contaminated equipment, hospital water or air. The stomach represents a potential site of secondary colonization and reservoir of nosocomial gram-negative bacilli.

Strategies to decrease modifiable risk factors responsible for VAP:

General Prophylaxis:

a)      Effective infection control measures: staff education, compliance with alcohol-based hand disinfection and isolation to reduce cross-infection with MDR pathogens.

b)     Surveillance of ICU infections, to identify and quantify endemic and new MDR pathogens, and preparation of timely data for infection control and to guide appropriate, antimicrobial therapy in patients with suspected HAP 11-13.

c)      Maintaining adequate staffing levels in the ICU can reduce length of stay, improve infection control practices, and reduce duration of mechanical ventilation.14,15

Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation:

a)      Non-invasive ventilation should be used whenever possible 16-18.

b)     Consider use of non-invasive ventilation to shorten the duration of invasive ventilation 19-21.

c)      Avoid continuous use of paralytics as far as possible as paralytics may prolong the duration of ventilation and increase the incidence of VAP 22.

d)     Ensure appropriate dosage of sedation or narcotics using sedation scale to avoid over-sedation22, 23.

e)      Interrupt or lighten sedation (sedation vacation) daily at an appropriate time to assess patient’s readiness for extubation24, 25.

f)       Wean patient off invasive ventilation as soon as possible21, 22.

g)      Prevent unplanned, accidental and patient selfextubation19, 23.

h)     Unnecessary re-intubation may increase the risk of VAP26, 27.

i)       Orotracheal intubation and orogastric tubes are preferred over nasotracheal intubation and nasogastric tubes to prevent nosocomial sinusitis and to reduce the risk of VAP28, 29.

j)       Endotracheal tube cuff pressure should be maintained at greater than 20 cm H2O to prevent leakage of bacterial pathogens around the cuff into the lower respiratory tract.30,31

 

Body Position and Enteral Feeding:

a)      Patients should be kept in the semi recumbent position (30–45°) rather than supine to prevent aspiration, especially when receiving enteral feeding32-36.

b)     Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition to reduce the risk of complications related to central intravenous catheters and to prevent reflux villous atrophy of the intestinal mucosa that may increase the risk of bacterial translocation37, 38.

c)      Enteral feeding may be a risk for aspiration in an intubated patient because of loss of cough reflex in these patients.

d)     Avoid gastric over distension by decreasing the volume of each feed. Also patients fed into the stomach had more episodes of gastro esophageal regurgitation and micro aspiration compared with patients fed beyond the pylorus.

 

Modulation of Colonization: oral Antiseptics and Antibiotics:

  1. Routine prophylaxis of VAP with oral antibiotics (selective decontamination of the digestive tract or SDD), with or without systemic antibiotics, reduces the incidence of VAP but is not recommended in patients who may be colonized with MDR pathogens 39, 40.
  2. Prophylactic administration of systemic antibiotics for 24 hours at the time of emergent intubation has been demonstrated to prevent VAP in patients with closed head injury 41.
  3. Modulation of oropharyngeal colonization by the use of oral chlorhexidine has prevented VAP in selected patient populations such as those undergoing coronary bypass grafting.

 

Care of the Respiratory Care Equipment: The policies and practices for disinfection, sterilization and maintenance of respiratory equipments should be aligned with evidence-based standards. Re-used respiratory accessories, including the breathing systems used for anesthesia, respirometer, resuscitation bag, nebulizer and test lung, should be properly cleansed and decontaminated after each use.22

a)      Allocate individualized respiratory equipment for each patient as far as possible.42

b)     Provide a new set of disposable or high level disinfected ventilator tubing for each patient.

c)      Change ventilator tubing when it is visibly soiled. No scheduled changes are recommended.18

d)     Use sterile water to fill the humidifier of ventilator. It is an acceptable option to set up a closed water-refilling system to minimize manipulation of the humidifier system.

e)      Change suction collection canisters and tubings for all patients.

f)       Handle and store disinfected respiratory equipment or sterile items properly to preserve its sterility.

g)      Check the expiry date and inspect the package of sterile respiratory items before use.

h)     Ensure the disinfected respiratory equipment (e.g. nebulizer) is not re-contaminated during rinsing process. Sterile water should be used.11,19

i)       In-line medication nebulizers: Use single dose vial of sterile medication or solution for nebulization whenever available. If multi-dose medication vials are used, ensure its sterility is maintained by proper storage and handling.11

Prevent Condensate from Ventilator Circuit Drain towards the Patients:

a)      Position the ventilator’s humidifier below the bed level to prevent condensation from draining toward the patients.24

b)     Drain the condensate from ventilator tubing to water traps periodically.24,27

c)      Always drain ventilator tubing and remove oral secretion before repositioning patient.

 

Prevent Leakage of Subglottic Secretion into the Lower Airway:

a)      Maintain the tracheal tube cuff pressure adequately to prevent the leakage of secretion into the lower airway.21, 24

b)     Ensure oral and subglottic secretion is cleared before tracheal cuff deflation.11

c)      Consider use of subglottic drainage endotracheal tube and tracheostomy tube for patients requiring mechanical ventilation > 72 hours. Subglottic secretion drainage system consists of an accessory aspiration conduit opening above the ETT cuff and a vacuum source. Secretions may be continuously or intermittently removed from the subglottic space.20

Oral Care:

a)      Daily assessment of oral hygieneand brushing the teeth with antiseptic toothpaste every 12 hourly to prevent plaque formation.

b)     Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine2- 4 hourly androutine suctioning of mouth to minimize risk of aspiration and use of a moisturizer to prevent mucositis helps in a big way in preventing oral flora disturbances.

Airway Humidification: Humidifiedair is important for adequate ventilation and oxygenation. It can be provided using heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers. HMEs are a better choice in view of cost effectiveness and easy to handle, though no change is documented in VAP rates with the use of either device.43

Endotracheal Suction System: There are two types of suction systems: open and closed. No significant difference in the incidence of VAP is seen with either of the two. But closed type is preferred because of the safety considerations for the healthcare worker exposure and cross contamination by the aerosolized secretions.

Hand Hygiene: WHO has designed Five Moments of Hand Hygiene on basis of the evidence concerning DAI prevention and control. It states hand washing before the patient contact, before an aseptic task, after body fluid exposure risk, after the patient contact and after contact with patients surroundings. This simple but important practice, if routinely followed can miraculously decrease all types of nosocomial infections.44

Stress Bleeding Prophylaxis, Transfusion, and Hyperglycemia:

a)      There is a trend toward reduced VAP with sucralfate, but there is a slightly higher rate of clinically significant gastric bleeding, compared with H2 antagonists. If needed, stress bleeding prophylaxis with either H2 antagonists or sucralfate is acceptable.45

b)     Transfusion of red blood cell and other allogeneic blood products should follow a restricted transfusion trigger policy; leukocyte-depleted red blood cell transfusions can help to reduce HAP.46

c)      Intensive insulin therapy is recommended to maintain serum glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dl in ICU patients to reduce nosocomial blood stream infections, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, morbidity, and mortality.26

CONTROVERSIES: There are no specific guidelines and recommendations regarding timing of tracheostomy and use of bacterial filters. Early tracheostomy definitely decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. It also prevents the complications of laryngeal injury and tracheal stenosis. A higher level of research is needed to actually comment on its early intervention.

 Most debated yet unresolved is institution of prophylactic intravenous as well as aerosolized antibiotics in suspected patients in view of theoretical concerns about the emergence of resistant bacteria despite the apparent benefit in terms of lower VAP rates. The timing to start the antibiotics is nowhere specified but individualized by the physician. This needs more specific considerations and extensive research work on local factors.

The practice of saline instillation in the tracheal tube to loosen secretions has been condemned as it may have potential detrimental effects such as decreasing oxygenation levels and causing contamination. But study by Caruso and colleagues have shown that saline instillation before tracheal suction decreases VAP rates by removing thick, tenacious secretions47. Also by stimulating cough reflex, secretions are easily and maximally sucked out thereby decreasing biofilm formation.

Future Prospectives: Spheres of interest that need to be explored are the modifications in the ETT like tube with an ultrathin cuff membrane and antimicrobial coating, tube a low-volume/low-pressure cuff, device for continuous monitoring of cuff inflation pressure and removal of biofilm. Patient positioning in the lateral and prone position, kinetic therapy and administration of probiotics are measures worthy of consideration. To increase the likelihood of success, clinicians and administrators should follow a “SMART” (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) approach for the implementation of such quality improvement efforts 48.

CONCLUSION: Aggressive surveillance is vital in understanding local factors leading to VAP and the microbiologic environment of a given unit. Judicious antibiotic usage is essential, as resistant organisms continue to plague intensive care units and critically ill patients. Simple nursing and respiratory therapy interventions for prevention should be adopted. Over the past several decades our understanding of VAP has grown significantly with regards to pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnostic testing, therapies, and prevention by modifying risk factors.

However, compliance with infection control protocols often wane overtime and can be significantly influenced by staffing levels in the ICU. Use of computerized flow sheets and quality rounding checklists in the ICU to improve compliance with care measures may help significantly. Last but not the least, despite having high grade evidence and strong recommendations, the biggest challenge remains in their actual execution into clinical practice.

BIBILOGRAPHY

  1. Kollef M H, P Silver, D M Murphy, E Trovillion. The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality. Chest. 1995; 108:1655-1662.
  2. Boyce J M, G Potter-Bynoe, L Dziobek, S L Solomon. Nosocomial pneumonia in Medicare patients. Hospital costs and reimbursement patterns under the prospective payment system. Arch. Intern. Med. 1991; 151:1109-1114.
  3. Van Nieuwenhoven, C A, E Buskens, D C Bergmans, F H van Tiel, G Ramsay, M J Bonten. Oral decontamination is cost-saving in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 32:126-130.
  4. Warren D K, S J Shukla, M A Olsen, M H Kollef, C S Hollenbeak, M J Cox, M M Cohen, V J Fraser. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31:1312-1317.
  5. Lai KK, Baker SP, Fontecchio SA. Impact of a program of intensive surveillance and interventions targeting ventilated patients in the reduction of ventilator associated pneumonia and its cost effectiveness. Infect Control HospEpidemiol. 2003 Nov;24(11):859-63
  6. Rello J, Lorente C, Bodi M et al. Why do physicians not follow evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator associated pneumonia? A survey based on the opinions of an international panel of intensivists. Chest. 2002;122: 656-61.
  7. Zack JE, Garrison T, Trovillion E et al. Effect of an education program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:2407–2412
  8. Lansford T, Moncure M, Carlton E et al. Efficacy of a pneumonia prevention protocol in the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients. Surg Infect 2007; 8:505–510
  9. Sona CS, Zack JE, Schallom ME et al. The impact of a simple, low-cost oral care protocol on ventilator associated pneumonia rates in a surgical intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2009; 24:54–62.
  10. Bouadma L, Mourvillier B, Deiler V et al. A multifaceted program to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia: Impact on compliance with preventive measures. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:789–796
  11. Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, Bridges C, Hajjeh R. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing health-care–associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004; 53(RR-3):1–36.
  12. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, Perneger TV. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene: Infection Control Programme. Lancet. 2000;356: 1307–1312.
  13. Kollef MH. The prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1999;340: 627–634.
  14. Marelich GP, Murin S, Battistella F, Inciardi J, Vierra T, Roby M. Protocol weaning of mechanical ventilation in medical and surgical patients by respiratory care practitioners and nurses: effect on weaning time and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2000;118:459–467.
  15. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 1715–1722.
  16. Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1995;333:817–822.
  17. Hilbert G, Gruson D, Vargas F, Valentino R, Gbikpi-Benissan G, Dupon M, Reiffers J, Cardinaud JP. Noninvasive ventilation in immunosuppressed patients with pulmonary infiltrates, fever, and acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 817–822.
  18. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, Arabi Y, Apezteguia C, Gonzalez M, Epstein SK, Hill NS, Nava S, Soares MA, et al. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation. N Engl J Med 2004;350: 2452–2460.
  19. Coffin SE, Klompas M, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Anderson DJ, et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29 Suppl 1:S31-S40.
  20. Kollef M. SMART approaches for reducing nosocomial infections in the ICU. Chest 2008;134 (2):447-56.
  21. Masterton R, Craven D, Rello J, Struelens M, Frimodt-Moller N, Chastre J, et al. Hospital-acquired pneumonia guidelines in Europe: a review of their status and future development. J AntimicrobChemother 2007; 60(2):206.
  22. Ducel G, Fabry J, Nicolle L. Prevention of hospital acquired infections: a practical guide. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  23. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 5 Million Lives Campaign. Getting Started Kit: Prevent Ventilator Associated Pneumonia How to Guide. Online 2008Available from: URL:www.ihi.org
  24. Coffin SE, Klompas M, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Anderson DJ, et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29 Suppl 1:S31-S40.
  25. Masterton RG, Galloway A, French G, Street M, Armstrong J, Brown E, et al. Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: Report of the Working Party on Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J AntimicrobChemother 2008;62 (1):5-34.
  26. Torres A, Gatell JM, Aznar E, et al. Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 1995; 152: 137-41.
  27. Kollef MH. The prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (8):627-34.
  28. Rouby JJ, Laurent P, Gosnach M, Cambau E, Lamas G, Zouaoui A, Leguillou JL, Bodin L, Khac TD, Marsault C. Risk factors and clinical relevance of nosocomial maxillary sinusitis in the critically ill. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 1994; 150 : 776–783.
  29. Holzapfel L, Chastang C, Demingeon G, Bohe J, Piralla B, Coupry A. A randomized study assessing the systematic search for maxillary sinusitis in nasotracheally mechanically ventilated patients. Influence of nosocomial maxillary sinusitis on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 1999;159 :695–701.
  30. Cook D, De Jonghe B, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C. Influence of airway management on ventilator-associated pneumonia: evidence from randomized trials. JAMA 1998; 279 : 781–787.
  31. Rello J, Sonora R, Jubert P, Artigas A, Rue M, Valles J. Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 1996; 154: 111–115.
  32. Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ros E, Piera C, Puig de la Bellacasa J, Cobos A, Lomena F, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the effect of body position. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116 :540–543.
  33. Orozco-Levi M, Torres A, Ferrer M, Piera C, El-Ebiary M, de la Bellacasa JP, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 1387–1390.
  34. Davis K Jr, Johannigman JA, Campbell RS, Marraccini A, Luchette FA, Frame SB, Branson RD. The acute effects of body position strategies and respiratory therapy in paralyzed patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care 2001;5 :81–87.
  35. Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, Nicolas JM, Nogue S, Ferrer M. Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 1851–1858.
  36. Pingleton SK, Hinthorn DR, Liu C. Enteral nutrition in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: multiple sources of tracheal colonization include the stomach. Am J Med 1986; 80: 827–832.
  37. Ibrahim EH, Mehringer L, Prentice D, Sherman G, Schaiff R, Fraser V, Kollef MH. Early versus late enteral feeding of mechanically ventilated patients: results of a clinical trial. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002; 26 :174–181.
  38. Craven DE, Driks MR. Nosocomial pneumonia in the intubated patient. Semin Respir Infect 1987; 2: 20–33.
  39. D'Amico R, Pifferi S, Leonetti C, Torri V, Tinazzi A, Liberati A. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1998; 316: 1275–1285.
  40. Rodriguez-Roldan JM, Altuna-Cuesta A, Lopez A, Carrillo A, Garcia J, Leon J, Martinez-Pellus AJ. Prevention of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients: use of an antimicrobial pharyngeal nonabsorbable paste. Crit Care Med 1990;18:1239–1242.
  41. Sirvent JM, Torres A, El-Ebiary M, Castro P, de Batlle J, Bonet A. Protective effect of intravenously administered cefuroxime against nosocomial pneumonia in patients with structural coma. Am J RespirCrit Care Med 1997;155: 1729–1734.
  42. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L. Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(10, Supplement 2):S65-S164.
  43. Lorente L, Lecuona M, Jiménez A, Mora ML, Sierra A. Ventilator-associated pneumonia using a heated humidifier or a heat and moisture exchanger: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2006;10 (4):R116.
  44. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Chraïti MN, Boyce J, Larson E, Pittet D. The World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Dec; 37 (10):827-34.
  45. Tryba M. Risk of acute stress bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated intensive care unit patients: sucralfate versus antacids. Am J Med 1987; 83: 117–124.
  46. Leal-Noval SR, Rincon-Ferrari MD, Garcia-Curiel A, Herruzo-Aviles A, Camacho-Larana P, Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R. Transfusion of blood components and postoperative infection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Chest 2001; 119: 1461–1468.
  47. Caruso P, Denari S, Ruiz SAL, Demarzo SE, Deheinzelin D (2009) Saline instillation before tracheal suctioning decreases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine 37: 32-38.
  48. Cook DJ, Kollef MH. Risk factors for ICU-acquired pneumonia. JAMA 1998;279(20):1605.

 

Videos :

watch?v