SEARCH ARTICLES



LATEST ARTICLES

Table of Contents

2020 Month : March Volume : 9 Issue : 10 Page : 705-710

Influence of Shear Bonding Strength of Lithium Disilicate to Enamel under Different Surface Treatments.

Hisham Abdullah Mously1, Sohil Ahmed Kazim2, Rashad Nabeel Nageeb3, Ghada Hussein Naguib4, Mohamed Tharwat Hamed5

Corresponding Author:
Mohamed Tharwat Hamed,
BDS, MSD, CAGS, MPH, MPHE, DMSc.
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics,
Cairo University School of Dentistry,
Alkasr Aleiny, Almanyal, Cairo, Egypt.
E-mail: mohsarwat62@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis and proper treatment planning should be established before making any prosthetic rehabilitation to restore the good appearance of the tooth, a better smile, phonetics, and to achieve perfect occlusion/mastication. We wanted to evaluate the changes of surface treatment protocols on the tensile bonding strength between enamel and ceramic restorations (lithium disilicate).

METHODS

A total of 20 freshly extracted, non-carious teeth were stored in normal saline solution at 25°C until used. Clean enamel surfaces 2 mm X 2 mm were obtained from the extracted teeth by using wheel diamond bur. Each enamel side received one E-max sprue, so four sprues of different surface treatment protocols per tooth (G1 TS: Etching, bonding, and curing. CS: Etching, monobond, curing, overall light cure) (G2 TS: Bonding, curing, self-etch / self-adhesive resin cement, overall light cure. CS: Monobond etch and prime) (G3 TS: Etching, bonding without curing. CS: Etching, monobond, curing, overall light cure) (G4 TS: Etching, bonding, curing. CS: Etching, monobond, bonding, curing, light-cure resin cement, overall light cure). Tensile bonding strength was measured using the Instron testing machine. One-way ANOVA test was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The highest mean was observed in Group 3 (124.34±43.47) followed by Group 1 (104.29±50.09), which is control group. In contrast, the lowest mean was observed in Group 2 (83.64 ± 53.56) and Group 4 (94.14±57.91). The results of ANOVA test have shown a significant difference between the surface treatment groups at 5% significance level.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrofluoric acid and primer/silane coupling agent create a porous surface on the ceramic that allow a good interaction with silane coupling agent.

KEY WORDS

Enamel, Hydrofluoric Acid, Lithium Disilicate, Primer, Silane, Tensile Bonding Strength

Videos :

watch?v

Download Download [ PDF ] Article Article Email Send to a friend References References Page Views Page Views(860) Facebook ShareFacebook Share Twitter ShareTwitter Share